I have not been able to see testimony today thus far but I'd like to comment on Roy Kronk. I remember his statements on the 911 calls, his statements to media and his statements in depos. I noted that there were some inconsistencies.
Bottom line - to believe that this man who is completely unrelated to the Anthony family or friends, had anything to do with the murder of Caylee, the disposal of her body, withholding evidence or moving her body, simply defies logic. It makes absolutely no sense. It is ludicrous. Regardless of a reward, etc.
JB wanted to discredit his testimony way back when when he was trying to pretend a kidnapping had occurred that did not involve his client. Now he's sticking with using Kronk in that manner because he has no defense and is throwing in everything and the kitchen sink.
But it has no relation to the new DT theory of an accidental death.
Why were there inconsistencies with Kronk? I think because he was really interested in the case and finding Caylee's body, perhaps he did want the reward or perhaps he did want justice but he was embarrassed by how intently he wanted to find her and by the incredible media attention he received afterward and the suspicion pointed his way (before the accidental death theory was in play) and he probably thought about possible suspicion pointing his way that he killed Caylee, even while he was making the calls. Thus, he manipulated the facts in order to deal with it all.