Pita
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2005
- Messages
- 359
- Reaction score
- 0
I am doubting the grief person will be allowed in.
I don't think so either, she never even spoke to Casey.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am doubting the grief person will be allowed in.
:floorlaugh: @ your last line. Who do you think will win in getting to do the cross? I say Jeff Ashton. :rocker:
Regarding computer viruses: since the trial started, and I have several windows open during, I've been running a full computer scan every night. I've found and disposed of trojans several times. I use AVG.
:floorlaugh: @ your last line. Who do you think will win in getting to do the cross? I say Jeff Ashton. :rocker:
Do we know who is still to testify for the DT, they say they have approx 6 witnesses left?
I'm guessing, Jesse Grund, River Cruz, the psychologist/grief expert(if they allow her to testify) George, Cindy, Lee Casey.
We have hear over and over again from the defense attorney's that THEY do not have to prove a thing. Well I believe that they CAN'T prove anything where their opening statement is concerned. But yesterday George didn't look as good (appeared he was covering up an affair-far cry from helping a murderer IMO), Kronk can go either way with each jury member, but the Cindy/Lee thing yesterday????? Bizarre. But if their goal is to have Cindy impeached, what happens to "And it smells like there's been a dead body in the damn car." Does that go poof if her testimony is impeached? Does that not become as damaging any longer after yesterday's little side show?
Regarding computer viruses: since the trial started, and I have several windows open during, I've been running a full computer scan every night. I've found and disposed of trojans several times. I use AVG.
Good Morning Everyone
I am listening to River Cruz(sp) on the Levi page show and she is beyond mad. I think it is a big mistake for the defense team to put her on the stand. She is a walking time bomb. I can't wait to see CA face when she is testifying. I guarantee her and GA will not be sitting close today.
We have hear over and over again from the defense attorney's that THEY do not have to prove a thing. Well I believe that they CAN'T prove anything where their opening statement is concerned. But yesterday George didn't look as good (appeared he was covering up an affair-far cry from helping a murderer IMO), Kronk can go either way with each jury member, but the Cindy/Lee thing yesterday????? Bizarre. But if their goal is to have Cindy impeached, what happens to "And it smells like there's been a dead body in the damn car." Does that go poof if her testimony is impeached? Does that not become as damaging any longer after yesterday's little side show?
Good morning gang!
I think there is actually 6 AFTER the grief dr. During the discussion about whether or not this dr. could testify HHJP asked the DT "after the dr. testimony how many more witnesses do you have?" and they said about half dozen.
IMO