Beyond Belief
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 25, 2005
- Messages
- 14,496
- Reaction score
- 98
Well, now we know she lied, geez, I think this information should be given to the jury. To keep it out is criminal.
What is a rebuttal for? Why doesn't the DT think that it is appropriate to bring up other people to rebut CAs statements? And reward the prosecution? I think the HHBP has been more than fair to the DT and has actually not let things happen for the SA just to make sure he is fair to the DT
Oh PLease Mr. Mason. How does this rebuttal make it a ' TRIAL BY AMBUSH? "
The work records are OBVIOUS evidence, not ambush material. Cindy tried to LIE and the state is trying to prove the TRUTH>
Defense just didn't have much to work with did they?
I'm nervous. We need these records in, guys. Very important!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He's given DT enough leeway. More than they should have had. The State has the right to a rebuttal and should be allowed to present. I do pray judge doesn't let DT get away with even more. This is big to Stae case.
Wow. I can't believe lightening didn't strike CM dead when he said it should be a trial by ambush. JEEBUS DEFENSE THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT YOU DID THE WHOLE TIME!!!! Er, tried to, but you know what I mean!
A Nurse, particularly a Nurse Manager is aware that ALL medical record documents are saved for a minimum of seven years. Her job was administrative, so she knew exactly that the records still existed, but lied.