borndem
Anglophile & registered demwit
- Joined
- May 15, 2010
- Messages
- 19,524
- Reaction score
- 52,252
I've always thought a plea deal equaled an honest statement from the perp...LE still maintains that EB lied - why did the state keep this deal?
EB's phone linked her to the crime scenes and she led LE to the remains...no COD does not mean no basis for finding the perp guilty. I don't get it. :no:
BBM
I've been wondering the same thing, L-CMom - Maybe they felt they couldn't have charged her with 1st DM -- what evidence of premeditation did they have? -- IDK. No COD really hurt their case, IMO.
And maybe it was truly 2ndDM -- EB just lost her temper, as she had so many times before, and beat her (??) so badly that she caused a blunt force trauma injury to her head, or just let her bleed to death, or smothered her (smothering takes a few minutes like strangulation, literally, and this could be stretched by the ADAs to 1st DM, possibly -- but they don't have proof of that...
Probably EB this time, just simply beat her too, too much & killed her. If so, a 2nd DM charge might have been the best they could do with no COD.
And NC Sentencing Guidelines state how many months a defendant can be charged -- it has to do with aggravating factors -- which she admitted and this added to her sentence today, also prior felony points add to a sentence, but IIRC, EB had none. So this might have been a better deal than we think. That's the best light I can put on it -- and I'm not trying to make the ADAs look good, I'm just trying to find something from this thing that I can tolerate & feel okay with.
I'm now, as we all are, pinning my hopes on the Feds with their drug charges -- and they spare no mercy on drug charges, rest assured of that. And our EB probably has nothing to give them to help reduce what could be a 115 YEAR sentence.
So cross your fingers, folks. And hope for the worst.