Basmat
Former Member
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2012
- Messages
- 85
- Reaction score
- 0
I believe the responsibility lies much further up with DFS and the judge, and legislators, who should never have allowed this kind of visitation given who the father was. They are the ones who, in calm moments, had access to research about the danger of this situation - a father who is a murder "person of interest" who's just been denied visitation.
Thank you. I place the blame on these same people as you. I know some will claim that the Constitution protects the rights of the parents and that the "higher ups" upheld the Constitution.
I don't think these people will find much comfort now in their protecting JP rather than those children. And they had LEEWAY but chose to not exercise it to the benefit of those precious boys.