foreverlennon
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2023
- Messages
- 38
- Reaction score
- 171
What was he doing?As Attorney Taylor is speaking, judge's facial expression is priceless. jmo
What was he doing?As Attorney Taylor is speaking, judge's facial expression is priceless. jmo
@imstilla.grandma Thx for the links.
First one is showing 'never before shared' pics. Still waiting on a full digital copy from her phone from authorities. These are the last moments from your child's life, and you're sitting here fighting with someone that doesn't care. (DEFINITELY not my opinion, that's his. I think he's (understandably) very emotional about it. Also my opinion that loved ones shouldn't be privvy to all info LE has when a trial hasn't even happened.)@imstilla.grandma Thx for the links.
The ^ videos open and run, but no cc, and no transcript shows below.
Cannot hear/listen to audio atm.
If parents make any new points, can someone pls summarize? TiA.
2nd vid is just the same portions of the first interview/video, just from a different source. Nothing new.@imstilla.grandma Thx for the links.
The ^ videos open and run, but no cc, and no transcript shows below.
Cannot hear/listen to audio atm.
If parents make any new points, can someone pls summarize? TiA.
@GemmieFirst one is showing 'never before shared' pics. Still waiting on a full digital copy from her phone from authorities. These are the last moments from your child's life, and you're sitting here fighting with someone that doesn't care. (DEFINITELY not my opinion, that's his. I think he's (understandably) very emotional about it. Also my opinion that loved ones shouldn't be privvy to all info LE has when a trial hasn't even happened.)
They were able to collect some of Kaylee's belongings over the summer, which raised concerns for them with how well possible evidence was processed, including a trashcan from Kaylee's room that was full and appeared untouched (which has been talked about pretty extensively in this thread)
After I got the above typed up I stopped because I recognized it as something I've recently read, so searched for an article you can instead read.
Kaylee Goncalves' parents share new details about how daughter killed in Idaho murders was found
The parents of Kaylee Goncalves sat down with ABC News for an exclusive interview, sharing new details of how she was found, as well as never-before-released images of her.abc7chicago.com
I'll take a look at the 2nd vid in a moment.
What is the difference between a digital phone log and what you see on your bill? IIRC Kaylee was on the G's phone plan. Her sister looked at her phone activity and told the media and internet about the calls to J right before the murders so what are they wanting to see from LE?
Once again, I am trusting Karma to make that never, ever, be so... smh
I know the G's may be causing some issues by being vocal, but they are victims of BK as well and are so very angry and hurt. I cannot judge their actions, even if I don't agree with all of them. I don't know how I would react if I had a daughter killed in the manner in which Kaylee was (actually all of them Madison, Kaylee, Xana and Ethan), I'd probably be losing my mind.
I wonder if that came from Logsdon. It's certainly melodramatic enough for him. I realize that death penalty appeals go on forever, but I still thought it was outrageous to tell the families that it will be decades before they have any chance for peace.
Agreed, very Logsdon-esque. It is very disheartening whomever made that public statement.I wonder if that came from Logsdon. It's certainly melodramatic enough for him. I realize that death penalty appeals go on forever, but I still thought it was outrageous to tell the families that it will be decades before they have any chance for peace.
That's pretty much admitting BK will be found guilty.
Yeah, I'm surprised at that. I thought this lawyer was pretty experienced. Seems a rookie move to brag about defending your client to the end by implying they're going to jail for, like, almost thirty years (presumably how long they expect appeals to go on for) before the trial's even happened.That's pretty much admitting BK will be found guilty.
That's pretty much admitting BK will be found guilty.
It was Logsdon.Agreed, very Logsdon-esque. It is very disheartening whomever made that public statement.
IMO
Thank you for posting this maconrich, I am going to watch when I finish up with the Murdaugh juror retrial motion.It was Logsdon.
IMHO it seemed like he was reacting more than responding. I personally think he pulled 28 out because of BK's age rather than it being the number of years it would realistically take - especially since 28 years is not, imho, realistic.
And, to be honest, I had to re-watch the hearing, and segments of it, a few times because everything felt off. I do not believe that Logsdon or the defense were saying BK is guilty, or at least I didn't hear anything that indicated or implied that. IMHO he could have chosen his words more carefully, and I wouldn't dare try to guess what he was thinking, but I didn't get the impression he was admitting defeat.
1:20:40
I find "pretty much admitting BK will be found guilty" extremely interesting since the defense knows a LOT more than we do about the case. I wonder what evidence they have, that we haven't seen, that seems to tie things up nice and pretty with a bow with this case?That's pretty much admitting BK will be found guilty.
Just my opinion, but the media should have included the rest of the sentence. It might not have been as gasp worthy, but it would have at least been correct.
"A trial won't put an end to this case. This case will go on for 28 years if they do actually achieve a conviction."
- Jay Logsdon
1:20:40