SBM for focus
That was my first thought as well when this issue came up a few months ago. But then I spent way too long going down rabbit holes and reading the science, and it turns out—maybe not.
Here's a
reputable study that shows why touch DNA isn't a slam dunk.
I still think BK is the killer, and I think the DNA is going to be a convincing bit of evidence, but judges have blocked it before due to some of the problems with it.
I don't think the State's case is nearly as tight as some think it is. But, with a gag order still in place, we're not privy to a lot of the information and the State may have a stronger (or weaker) case than I currently think.