sdmike1974
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2010
- Messages
- 236
- Reaction score
- 259
I understand your concern. But it may be just the opposite in that the jury questions are more favorable to the prosecution.I feel that having the jurors have the opportunity to ask... and have answered... questions for the defendant... is an enlightening experience for the jurors and the Prosecuting Attorney...
However... Do you think there could be a down-side to this practice, as well, as the answers to personally written questions could create a subconscious "connection" between the jurors and the defendant?...
Thus... possibly making it more difficult to decide on the Death Penalty?
TIA
I read the following which may shed some light on why so many states do not allow juror questions, even though most of us (perhaps all of us) are highly in favor of them.
Defense attorneys say jurors will inevitably put more weight than they should on their own questions and make it more likely jurors will rush to judgment without taking into account all the evidence admitted at trial.
If that's really true, then I say, "Too bad."