But in all seriousness, in every case that I've followed here on WS, it's the same pattern.
RSBM
Great post. Just to comment on this bit. It's what's led me to be so sceptical about these kinds of claims - because it's happening in every single case. Injustices are real of course, but it is a bit hard to believe in these high profile cases. It just seems to have become the norm for defence teams to go beyond requiring the prosecution to prove guilt, claims of investigative shortcomings or incompetence etc, to always claiming their innocent client is the victim of misfeasance or straight up corruption.