StarryStarryNight
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2017
- Messages
- 3,528
- Reaction score
- 43,745
If I may be so bold as to take a wag ... it's time for in limine motions/hearings - getting evidence and experts approved and Gull may have gagged/sealed certain of these proceedings/evidence/experts and/or witness lists etc... Hearings may be closed but ... RA would need to be at these hearings ... might require transport/alternate accommodations for RA for pre-trial and trial - could be in the works. JMHO
That’s a good thought.
I would think, and I’m obviously confused, plus I’m no clerk of court, that the actual in limine motions would be listed as such and since in limine motions are, by definition, held outside the eyes of the jury and public, why would the judge need to reiterate that by a notice excluding them from public view?
(Hmmmm. That is a run-on sentence, pretty sure)
I will mention, at my own peril, that the defense plays the file and leak game, and absolutely nothing has been heard about what these filings contain.
it’s weird to me.
I wonder about plea deals.