Not necessarily. He could be guilty and rambling on about his past deeds but being in a mental break could mean he was hazy on the facts. It doesn't necessarily mean he was lying.
True!
Yes typo, that was supposed to be feet, not inches. I believe RA and his atty were in a closed room and the CO was recording through a glass window. I don't know if the window was cracked open. I'm assuming he could not hear what they were saying.Perhaps I'm lost and you can help me.Maybe I missed an important detail?
First, you've got 10" there, but I'm thinking you mean 10' ?
If I understand this, a guard is filming 10 ft from a privileged client meeting in a private quiet room for *advertiser censored* time (for an hour, likely more?)
Is the guard in the private quiet room or outside of it. i.e. Are you describing a closed room situation w/windows and a camera outside the room such that being 10 ft away involves being on the other side of a closed room filming through a window?
Maybe we don't know.
Ten inches would be within hearing distance for sure. Ten feet, probably. Wouldn't that all get sorted out in depositions?
It was feet. It was a typo that I didn't catch. I'll spell it out the next time.
Sure, but how many meters was it?It was feet. It was a typo that I didn't catch. I'll spell it out the next time.
3.048 meters.Sure, but how many meters was it?
Do you think the state hired lip readers to transcribe confidential privileged attorney/client conversations? Or maybe less formal, like: This is what they said...
got it! makes sense and thanks!
Both, I think. I suspect they would be as interested in what his atty was saying to RA.
MOO depends on their commitment. It's a 90 minute drive from Delphi to Westville, this kind of drive is something lawyers do all the time. Usually making work calls while driving.
If they had been meeting with their client regularly and noticed a decline in his mental health they could have put in a request for him to transferred to a facility that has a mental health unit such as Wabash. IMO
Sure, but how many meters was it?
Do you think the state hired lip readers to transcribe confidential privileged attorney/client conversations? Or maybe less formal, like: This is what they said...
Hi layer,
Very cool! Thank you for this.Ex sign language interpreter here with a degree in ASL.
Only about 40% of sounds can actually even been seen on the lips. Many letters are actually hard to distinguish from others, like B and P/M, N, and NG /CH and J.
Even for a a skilled lipreader (Deaf or hearing), about the highest accuracy that can be achieved is between 45-60% when lipreading a bit of speech several sentences long. The higher end of that relies on: good lighting (not so bright as to wash out the person's lips, not too dark), the speaker staying completely facing the lipreader the entire time, the person not speaking too slow (that over-exaggerates the mouth movements and makes them confusing) or too fast, not having facial hair, not having very pale lips. Accuracy is also increased if the lipreader's is familiar/accustomed to the speaker, the topic of conversation is known, etc.
Over half of lipreading is educated guessing to fill in the blanks. And even that doesn't always help.
From what I've been able to find, there isn't any sort of training & certification program for people who call themselves professional/expert lip readers. It is much a talent (even for Deaf people...some are bad lip readers) as it is a technical skill.
Many people get the impression that lipreading is easy because they were able to lipread a short phrase (like between a coach and a player at a sporting event). But that is world's away from an entire conversation where the topic can switch back and forth multiple times.
Hi gremlin444,Ex sign language interpreter here with a degree in ASL.
Only about 40% of sounds can actually even been seen on the lips. Many letters are actually hard to distinguish from others, like B and P/M, N, and NG /CH and J.
Even for a a skilled lipreader (Deaf or hearing), about the highest accuracy that can be achieved is between 45-60% when lipreading a bit of speech several sentences long. The higher end of that relies on: good lighting (not so bright as to wash out the person's lips, not too dark), the speaker staying completely facing the lipreader the entire time, the person not speaking too slow (that over-exaggerates the mouth movements and makes them confusing) or too fast, not having facial hair, not having very pale lips. Accuracy is also increased if the lipreader's is familiar/accustomed to the speaker, the topic of conversation is known, etc.
Over half of lipreading is educated guessing to fill in the blanks. And even that doesn't always help.
From what I've been able to find, there isn't any sort of training & certification program for people who call themselves professional/expert lip readers. It is much a talent (even for Deaf people...some are bad lip readers) as it is a technical skill.
Many people get the impression that lipreading is easy because they were able to lipread a short phrase (like between a coach and a player at a sporting event). But that is world's away from an entire conversation where the topic can switch back and forth multiple times.
www.websleuths.com
