I'm not certain a clear timeline of the recordings will be presented in court.Riddle me this:
If CC lost 70 days of interviews due to taping system user error (?) ... how many of those interviews were about entirely different cases than this case?
This 2017 case (Abby/Libby) and its investigation has been extremely protracted, but other CC cases/investigations/trials have not.
Assuming other 2017 interviews were used in other 2107 CC cases ... when did CC LE realize that 70 days of taped interviews were lost?
Was the system only for the Abby/Libby case?
If he left by the path shown, shouldn't there be video of him walking past that store?It isn't graphic at all, but it is hard to watch once BG and the 2 dots representing Abby and Libby are moving together down the hill and to the crime scene.
I've learned soooooo much from following trials here.If he left by the path shown, shouldn't there be video of him walking past that store?
That span of time, even sped up, when his dot is alone with their dots is so chilling. Somber music hits hard.
It isn't graphic at all, but it is hard to watch once BG and the 2 dots representing Abby and Libby are moving together down the hill and to the crime scene.
This was based on the AA and the eye witness statements as well as the video time stamps for the cars coming and going. It is very well done and shows just how possible it is for 1 man to do this and for that person to be the one each witness or group of witnesses saw.
I would guess her sketch would be less accurate than someone who physically passed him and saw his face as he went by. I wonder if she assumed he was younger because he was out on the bridge. I know I would think that if I just saw a person standing there and I turned around and walked away. I might just assume they were younger if I was asked later. I think the puffy hair she saw could have been whatever hat/hood or both he had on at that time. IF he says he didn't see anyone else then it's possible he didn't even look at her or notice she was there and turned around and went the other way.
My husband has more than that and he’s not a murderer (that I know of).Can someone let me know why someone would have so many multi tools? RA had several. Is it like carrying a pocket knife? Please point me to any threads where these were discussed.
DocumentCloud
View attachment 497992
View attachment 497991
I'm not certain a clear timeline of the recordings will be presented in court.
" ... the state in September said they did not have any recordings of the interviews and “offered no explanation as to why these didn’t exist,” the motion states.
Prosecutors subsequently sought to have Allen’s attorneys, Brad Rozzi and Andrew Baldwin, removed from the case. The duo were controversially removed by Special Judge Fran C. Gull in October before the Indiana Supreme Court reinstated them last month."
Hence, when the D discovered the recordings were missing, the P made a motion to have them removed from the case.
I'm not certain a clear timeline of the recordings will be presented in court.
" ... the state in September said they did not have any recordings of the interviews and “offered no explanation as to why these didn’t exist,” the motion states.
Prosecutors subsequently sought to have Allen’s attorneys, Brad Rozzi and Andrew Baldwin, removed from the case. The duo were controversially removed by Special Judge Fran C. Gull in October before the Indiana Supreme Court reinstated them last month."
Hence, when the D discovered the recordings were missing, the P made a motion to have them removed from the case.
Carter = figurehead that speaks plenty of word salad.even more baffling. MOO
Carter = figurehead
I also agree. Absolutely possibly for 1 man do that and more in that time, in my opinion. I remember that much before RA was arrested, Gray talked he heard from one source about one of the girls mentioning a gun on the video and he also said he know nothing about the crime scene but he heard that the killer spent many time at the crime scene. Seems he was right.
´
It is very well done and shows just how possible it is for 1 man to do this and for that person to be the one each witness or group of witnesses saw.
I'm not sure that's necessary at all. This trial is going to be a twisted mess, like every other part of this case has been, but ultimately I expect the state to prevail.My dream for this case is DD someway had recorded his interview with RA and would find it. I'm almost sure RA would be totally screwed if that's happening. But I don't think it will be hapening. So many mistakes in this investigation.
Carhatt has been very popular in Cali for a long time. My son and his friends wore it for 'skate wear' and street wear on the 90's.A random post but i was In central London and I noticed they are opening a Carhartt store and until RA’s jacket I had never even heard of the brand. So they must be growing in popularity to open a branch in the U.K.
A killer using their jacket brand hasn’t dented sales ( moo)
Good stuff! Working guys wore them way back, especially the coveralls. They were "cool" for a while, I think that died when GW wore them at the ranch all the time. I have never seen any carhartt jacket that thin, I think undergarments gave people the impression it was a thicker jacket than it is. I have a twill carhartt that is thin as I've ever seen and it still seems way thicker than what BG has on to me.Carhatt has been very popular in Cali for a long time. My son and his friends wore it for 'skate wear' and street wear on the 90's.
This place will do that to you!he’s not a murderer (that I know of).
RSABBMHence, when the D discovered the recordings were missing, the P made a motion to have them removed from the case.
Per the PCA it’s a witness that saw him as she drove east on 300n. He was walking west on the north side and she would have been on the south side if she were obeying rules of traffic.Thanks!
Gah, I hate the way these roads are labeled. So the actual road is W 300 N at approx 3:57. If the the sighting was on the north side, it would have had to have been before this road turns north and passes the CPS building.
Do we know which of the post-crime witnesses this is - the earlier or the later?
JG was the one that asked for BR and AB to withdraw on 10/19 after the distribution of crime scene photos from their law office; despite protection and gag orders.I'm not certain a clear timeline of the recordings will be presented in court.
" ... the state in September said they did not have any recordings of the interviews and “offered no explanation as to why these didn’t exist,” the motion states.
Prosecutors subsequently sought to have Allen’s attorneys, Brad Rozzi and Andrew Baldwin, removed from the case. The duo were controversially removed by Special Judge Fran C. Gull in October before the Indiana Supreme Court reinstated them last month."
Hence, when the D discovered the recordings were missing, the P made a motion to have them removed from the case.
Thank you. I really hope so because I really believe they have the right man despite of all mistakes in the investigation. But I don't know if they have more direct evidence. I don't think they have DNA (I think Paul Holes or Ives said this crime will not be solved trought DNA) and even were more evidence in 2017, RA had 5 years to clean/get rid over the evidence. I don't know if the juries will understand the circunstancial/inference/indirect evidence and with so many mistakes in this investigation, I see a possibility of him walks.I'm not sure that's necessary at all. This trial is going to be a twisted mess, like every other part of this case has been, but ultimately I expect the state to prevail.
BTW your english is perfect!