vinayd
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2013
- Messages
- 533
- Reaction score
- 3,867
The judge has to first decide if the jury is going to hear it. If the Judge, State and D know who the dots are and they are not relevant to RA. Why talk about it? We need to talk about RA, his phone, his alibi, his explanation and confessions.Because the jury is the trier of fact, not the judge. Those three dots have to be proven to be who they are, which is a fact question.