Thank you!Perhaps we're being punked about pings.
Perhaps these were events internally generated that awakened the phone. Incoming calls/texts. Scheduled updates.
A stretch to describe that as the phone being somehow in transit. Phone may have had its reasons for trying to ping off one tower or another.
The D is trying to delay the time of death to a point in time where RA has a locked alibi
But I suspect the actual data will show that, at a point that afternoon, Libby's phone didn't move but did continue communicating with towers, none of which was generated by Libby herself. And the cessation of human driven contact on her phone indicates TOD, close to 2:13 and nowhere near 5 pm on 2/13 or 4 am on 2/14.
Think about what happens to one's phone when left on a charger overnight. It doesn't move but apps are updated. Emails and messages are received. Busy phone, no one in possession of it.
It's only the Defense trying to manipulate the timeline.
JMO
I am not surprised at all (the D and their ways) and when released in this way, there is no expert on the stand to explain any of it and dispute what they write. So while this isn't lying, it is interpreting data however they want to that best suites their client. Now if this was in a court room with a phone expert on the stand I'd imagine it would be explained quickly and there would be no discussion about it.
Her phone was under her body. I'm sure that didn't help the signal either and as you said pinging it or someone calling her or texting her is not proof that her phone moved.
Trial day can't come soon enough so we can just discuss FACTS presented at trial.