Motion Madness Monday!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Have you seen my coke, @twall ?![]()
Okie dokie. I'll bring cookies and we can read together.Yes. In my fridge!
From the motion to dismiss, the attached paragraph caught my eye. Now, I don’t at this point trust the D to tell me what is exculpatory. But I’d like to know what their claim is.Motion to Dismiss
DEFENDANT’S SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS BASED UPON
NEWLY DISCOVERED DESTROYED AND/OR MISSING EXCULPATORY OR POTENTIALLY USEFUL EVIDENCE
Dismiss.pdf.pdf
Memorandum
MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S SECOND
MOTION TO DISMISS ...
Memorandum in Support of Dismiss.pdf
Appears it is from Libby’s phone?From the motion to dismiss, the attached paragraph caught my eye. Now, I don’t at this point trust the D to tell me what is exculpatory. But I’d like to know what their claim is.
View attachment 504802
They can cut and paste from the Constitution but they can’t spell Turco’s name correctly.
Oh well. Guess RA will sit in prison since the motion for safekeeping hearing is not happening.
Yes. Unclear if the evidence is in the famous video or elsewhere on the phone.Appears it is from Libby’s phone?
Is it new? Or part of what they already had in the 26 TB, that Nick’s staff then neatly organized, indexed and bookmarked for them?That's on Nick because he introduced new discovery.
05/20/2024 | Notice Issued Notice of mailing of transcript |
I can't remember the exact wording but I got the impression it was new. I didn't read that Nick said it was something the D had all this time.Is it new? Or part of what they already had in the 26 TB, that Nick’s staff then neatly organized, indexed and bookmarked for them?
It makes me think it's all nonsense, not relevant.IMO That's because she won't set a hearing for it. Why not?
It makes me think there is something in the Franks that she doesn't want to have to make a ruling on and explain how she got there. She needs to do that. MOO
Yes. Unclear if the evidence is in the famous video or elsewhere on the phone.
Well, she said this partial quote below.It makes me think it's all nonsense, not relevant.
05/08/2024 | Order Issued |
YesSo the hearing is cancelled for tomorrow through Thursday?
So the defense wants hearings and complains the judge won't hold hearings and then they get one, but then want to continue the hearing and it's denied so they file a motion (at the last minute) to remove the judge that would require she respond before having a hearing? So the judge has no choice but to deal with it first before the hearing can be held so now she has to cancel the hearing?
Again more games.
section 39 was a hot mess express as well. IMOThey can cut and paste from the Constitution but they can’t spell Turco’s name correctly.
Oh well. Guess RA will sit in prison since the motion for safekeeping hearing is not happening.
That's on Nick because he introduced new discovery.
Just what the judge said, not set for a hearing unless necessary...unless #4 contains something the others haven't to date...something relevant. MOWell, she said this partial quote below.
What do you think is looming ahead that would make it necessary?
05/08/2024 Order Issued
Defendant's third and fourth Request for Franks Hearing will be ruled upon and not set for hearing unless necessary.