This is absolutely 100% true based on what I've seen of this case. They'll blame anyone or anything while their own client keeps telling everyone he's guilty. A notable exception are YouTubers that spread the D's "message of innocence," they, like Ricky, are beyond reproach. Yeah, and those same YouTubers are probably hoping they can jockey themselves into position for being the next person RA confesses to.
People make false confessions all the time, for all different reasons. But based on the totality of the evidence against RA, this unfortunately doesn't look like one of those situations. Since the D's future interests rest with books, a lecture circuit, spots on said YouTubers' shows, and appeals of the almost certain conviction of this client, they're going to chase down the old war horse, pelt her with insults and continue to exercise their "tactics," which look like chicanery and sometimes conjure up images of snake charming and circus sideshow acts. In the meantime, I think RA's guilty, and how do you think the D attorneys would view him approaching them saying he wants to cop a plea? What's that going to do to their futures on the lecture circuit, what about the appeals? What about the YouTube shows? I think they'd view that with horror as it would end the public spectacle they've been thriving in. So in the meantime, RA may be viewing a plea deal as something that's not of practical value in that the DP isn't really in play, so he can't benefit too much from a plea deal. He's getting life without parole no matter what. But he could negotiate for leniency with that deal, and it may translate into practical benefits. I'm just saying, this person cannot seem to stop confessing, and the evidence against him does seem to strongly support RA's own case against himself. It looks like a better and stronger case than the one his attorneys are advancing. That's the problem.
