Agree!It was an innocent remark made at sidebar turned into something gross by the D, but it's all good.
Like yourself, I'm sure NM is over disparaging commentary.
moo
Oh I hope the court agrees to live audio recording! Maybe then the D would think twice about yelling at the judge in the courtroom that she doesn't understand anything about the case.
BINGO!
I went back over the transcript to see what I'm missing and the man doesn't know the color of the car or anything descriptive other than "an older car". Is this older like a 90s car or like a 60s classic car? no clarification that I saw? If he said "I saw a mercury comet parked there" or even an old classic car, then that could be considered conflicting, but to me, this is too broad to scratch out the very specific eyewitness statement given to the police (and I still don't know even know who this man is ?).
D - "Mean Judge Gull, look she jokes with NM and not us and makes mean faces at us too". I swear all I can hear is waaah.
Appreciate your candidness regarding your intense feelings re the defense in this case. (And of course you're not the only one.)
I was driving when I heard on car radio news that a search party had been organized that day for girls missing in Indiana. I also recall emphasis by a woman who saw a man walking along the main road. A car parked on the roadside was witnessed by many people. (Wondering in a town that size why it wasn't possible to follow this car lead 'sooner'?) RA's auto may match, or not; it was the early publicized lead.
Yeah, I remember that one.
Gosh MJ, stop trying to throw us off with real facts.
We see things differently again!D - "Mean Judge Gull, look she jokes with NM and not us and makes mean faces at us too". I swear all I can hear is waaah.
The D brought attention and made record of it by their Response to try and embarrass NM and the Judge, it was said in a sidebar conversation. The Judge was asking how long NM needed to present the rest of his case, and NM thought she meant bathroom break time.
Judge Gull said it like any or many others would have done, "no dummy, or in this case, ding dong, I don't need to know about that." She was trying to plan a lunch break or a 15 minute recess.
It wasn't funny, it didn't stick, it didn't hurt and made no point other than to further show how juvenile and petulant Rozzi and Baldwin have become IMO. If it would make Rozzi and Baldwin feel better or help their emos and feels than maybe we should send Judge Gull a letter asking her to refer to them as such also.
I thought you must have liked it since you added It to your tagline, cool. Voila', everyone is happy now.
JMHO
thank you very much for the correction and this opportunity to agree.
RBBM
Who are the above names? I don't recognize any of them. Who is requesting a bench trial? Richard Allen?
It's in the attachment, but MW is Baldwins friend who leaked the defense information. His Motion to dismiss was denied and he is asking for a bench trial set for Sept.
Have you seen any of his "multiple confessions"? Neither have I. I'm going to hold off asserting that he "confessed" until there is some evidence to back up the assertions he confessed.
The public probably will not see the confessions until the trial. His defense team admitted he confessed/made incriminating statements. In a hearing, the warden says he confessed to him in letters but the defense stopped that. People who are at the hearing heard that he also confessed to health workers. The defense are trying to dismiss the confessions/incriminating statements because "coerced" or because he isn't in his right mind (they are constantly changing the reason) and the prosecution asked them to put in filings which confessions are coerced. The defense didn't answer until now.
