MOO He saw them they saw him.In my opinion, the descriptions do not line up.
They passed him under bare tree cover, blotchy sun.
MOO He saw them they saw him.In my opinion, the descriptions do not line up.
They passed him under bare tree cover, blotchy sun.
Yes. Their witness acounts complete with some discrepancies are how witnesses who are not coached answer.I'm not sure what you mean by this. Do you mean this accounts for their conflicting accounts of what he looked like? I don't understand.
No, I’m sure RA meant another group of exactly 3 girls at that exact location, at that exact time who also described someone dressed in the same manner RA described himself as dressing. Pure coincidence and the descriptions are absolutely nothing alike.Yes. Their witness acounts complete with some discrepancies are how witnesses who are not coached answer.
RA said he saw them.
Sure. But if they can’t rely on JG to keep to any kind of time management and the prosecution effectively uses too much time for each thing then what would happen? Is the defence then supposed to hastily cut down their case to meet her strict end date? It’s not realistic. All she needed to do was state on record if needed she would extend. She didn’t because she already set closed dates for the jurors. Ok I get that. But I feel like D went in expecting shared time not expecting the judge to suggest she’d cut them off to keep on time.The prosecution always gets more time because they have the burden of responsibility to present their case in full. AND the defense has equal time to cross examine each witness---so that time is not ALL going to the prosecution.
The defense does not have to set out all the facts of the case to the jury. They are rebutting with their witnesses and experts, but that does not take as much time, because they do not have to lay out the entire explanation of the case to the jury---that has already been done.
The prosecution will present 45 witnesses/experts. But that is because they include the families of the victims, the officers present at crime scene, witnesses present that day, the homicide detectives, and the stable of experts from th Medical Examiners, The FBI forensics team, etc
The defense will have nowhere near 45 witnesses, but they do get to cross examine all 45, and they can recall any of them and bring in some rebuttal experts of their own.
old bridge guy & young bridge guy, no? One with the puffy hair who may look young but is NOT the same guy as the original sketch (old bridge guy). No wait. He’s the same. No wait he may be a mix of both sketches.There is only one BG as far as I’m aware. RA hasn’t mentioned another BG either.
He would have been found guilty by now if his defense actually did their jobs and didn’t delay the trial. No doubt more delays will be forthcoming as they continually try and play the system. As they won’t get him off in a trial as Odins did it is farcical and has a billion holes in it.
IMHO