just catching up with the latest developments. I can't even pretend to be shocked. This is nothing short of what I suspected and expected of the defense.
Was it illegal? When did JG pay out for the costs? If they erred in the paperwork that’s on B&R but if their names were not on the funder directly - how is this on them? If it wasn’t illegal then it is what it is. So what if someone played up the idea of poor Rick? If he did it, the state should have a solid case and get their conviction. Lawyers are strategists. Spin masters if you will. Why would we expect them not to spin within the confines of the law?
I grew up in what might as well have been Andy Griffith’s fictional Mayberry. There used to be Mayberrys. Nobody’s really safe anywhere anymore.
I read somewhere that his last stint in prison was before they did mandatory blood testing on prisoners. So Delphi wouldn’t have had any way to connect him to the crime IF they had collected any DNA from the crime scene. I remember how he had so many photos of the area, and other tell tale signs that he knew something. It was as if he was taunting LE. Just very curious.
This one I agree is out of line!
I’ll have to google what the Karen read template is - never heard of it. But sounds interesting! Thanks for helping me to understand what’s going on.
This entire case has been a nightmare from the beginning. From the “Keystone Cops” to this legal drama today. They have drawings, a voice recording, and evidence, but still no one is paying for the crime. Years are passing by, memories fade, evidence gets lost, people pass away, and yet here we are, going on eight years since the girls were brutally murdered and still, no one has been arrested. Why?
Not nice but an interesting (gross) strategy. I’m glad to learn about the things that go on in such trials. It still doesn’t seem to really change things for RA though, does it? The state needs a solid case to get their conviction. They must believe they have it or they wouldn’t have arrested him and proceeded in the direction of trial.
I still watch the re-runs. It told a story with every episode, always a lesson learned and without one curse word, sexual innuendo, nudity, violence, politics, or racism. Ahhh, the good old days when television was entertaining.
One would hope. What’s everyone’s feeling about the outcome, guilty or not?
RA is the only one that can answer that question, but we can use the info we have to make educated guesses.
I can’t even recall who DH is??I think the gimmie money was first set up by a YT person and then Hennessy took control, not Ausbrook.
The Due Process Gang was making fun of DH. That's gotta sting when he hears what they've said about him.
JMO
David Hennessey.
They were cornered on the other side of the bridge and crossing back over quickly was not an option. They were stuck and this man had a gun. Have you ever had a gun pointed at you? I haven't, but I can say with nearly 100% certainty that if I did, I would do whatever the person with the gun said in order to not get shot. We know from what has been released that Libby was recording the man on the bridge and we can hear him talking and telling them to go down the hill. One of the girls mentions a gun so it's safe to say he had the gun visible to them when he was telling them to go down the hill. I do not know weather other people were involved, but what we do know is only 1 was recorded by the girls and only one is heard speaking to them, only 1 was seen on the trail prior to the girls arriving and only 1 man was seen on the bridge minutes before Abby and Libby arrived at the bridge. One man with a gun absolutely could get 2 young girls to comply and go where he was directing them to go.
I can't put them into the words I truly want to hear @nadia90 for fear of breaking the TOS. I can say it's the most vulgar, jarring, cruel, and mean spirited things I've heard.
Ah I did think it was some YouTube person who started it actually. I wouldn’t have donated either way.
I believe he is guilty in whole or in part. I’m waiting to see what the state has. Hoping it’s a strong case. What comes to mind for me is RA telling the interviewing officer not to F with his wife. That and the whole bullet thing make me think he’s got blood on his hands.
I have to say the case was lacking integrity from the beginning. The online gossip columns are endless and always have been. Makes me wonder if so much secrecy around this case has had the opposite of its intended effect.MOO IMO
I care about the integrity of this case and respectfully discussing this topic is within TOS (link to the TOS forum below).
I suspect others care, too. Those who do not may put me on “ignore” or “scroll and roll.”
MOO IMO ETC
