As to the bolded above, That is my biggest takeaway.
Because her story makes no sense,IMO. She claimed someone 'hacked' into her account and locked her out and stole her messages. But the OWNER of the account already stepped forward, with ALL of the messages, after he locked down the whole Discord.
Context wouldn't help most of the worse content. If you haven't watched than it is hard for you to understand how negative and damaging many of these comments were---no context could have saved most of them.
Hacking is the first excuse people make when they are called out on certain posts that rub people the wrong way---I WAS HACKED!
Well, I forget which state she is in, but in Carolina where I believe she is from... according to Google a Licensed Clinical Social Worker can diagnose mental health conditions. Lisette Deese, LCSW - North CarolinaShe is an associate licensed clinical social worker. She does not have her full license, and is working towards getting it while practicing under the supervision of an experienced LCSW.
I’m not sure they’ll cancel her for her remarks about the families, but might for some of the comments she allegedly made that could be construed as practicing outside of her scope (such as various diagnoses she gave regarding the judge, “in [her] professional opinion”).
There are pretty rigid ethics codes, and I’m actually pretty shocked she was behaving like this with a license that’s so easily revoked.
LCSW Associate - North Carolina Social Work Certification and Licensure Board
Pursuant to the North Carolina Social Worker Certification and Licensure Act, NCGS § 90B, it is unlawful to engage in or offer to engage in the practice ofncswboard.gov
Everything except for the definition of LCSWA is my opinion
Well I don't think she used the word hacked - at least not in the article I read and cited earlier upthread. She said someone stole the chat messages after accessing them using a password they knew a member was using to participate in the chat. Here is the quote:Hacking is the first excuse people make when they are called out on certain posts that rub people the wrong way---I WAS HACKED!
www.wishtv.com
I don't know if there is a legal license / standard for this type of thing there either, but if not, then it seems they can use whomever they choose to. It would appear they declined the offer of help (at least we have no proof to suggest they accepted it)... so its all a lot of smoke and mirrors about a lot of nothing that will affect the case outcome imo.
Great if true. I'll wait for an entire release. Then watch the parties argue amongst themselves and burn it all down. That seems what they're most intent on. Imo.
Meh... not interested in chasing them down... nor listening to them... if they want to produce it that's up to them.
Murder Sheet
Well, I don't actually know what type of practice she wants to do / is doing at the moment, and it doesn't make her sound the most compassionate when we hear she has said unkind things about the family, but maybe there is some reason why she holds the opinions she holds about the family that we are not really privy to. I've said this before, everyone has opinions on just about everything. I'd be willing to bet some of the members here have private view points on key players in various cases that they don't express in the main thread as it is against the TOS. We may not like when people express public views against our own, but they're not legally precluded from doing so - unless they're in breech of an order, or committing some sort of actual crime like slander or libel etc....
But that is the definition of 'hacking'---stealing chat messages by accessing someone else's password
Here is the quote:
And here is the link:Leaked group chat reveals defense team strategies in Delphi murders case
The cohosts of "The Murder Sheet Podcast" told I-Team 8 they were given thousands of messages from the group chat.
(quote below).
Hacking seems to involve a bit more sneaking about: What Is Hacking? Types of Hacking & More | Fortinet
Wieneke shared a statement with I-Team 8.
Actually I just realized she says “accessed her” acct (CW in the link in the post I’m commenting on). I thought it was some man who was the “owner” of the group chat etc who provided these to Ms? That he had access because he was a group member. She seems to disagree with this idea or I have misunderstood the leaker to be a male maybe?Well I don't think she used the word hacked - at least not in the article I read and cited earlier upthread. She said someone stole the chat messages after accessing them using a password they knew a member was using to participate in the chat. Here is the quote:
And here is the link:Leaked group chat reveals defense team strategies in Delphi murders case
The cohosts of "The Murder Sheet Podcast" told I-Team 8 they were given thousands of messages from the group chat.
(quote below).
Hacking seems to involve a bit more sneaking about: What Is Hacking? Types of Hacking & More | Fortinet
Wieneke shared a statement with I-Team 8.
I’m only pointing out - CW did not say she was hacked. She said someone accessed the chat using a password they knew which belonged to one of the group members. At any rate, and either way… they can’t both be telling the truth (MS & CW). Back to he said she said.
