Not really. Sounds like he was walking. Noting the man and then calling in after the girls were missing or gound.
I don’t know but someone here may: when did this witness contact Le to advise them of the person she saw? If she didn’t call in that night or the day after when the kids were found dead, then when did she call? I wonder if there was a delay, how was she certain of which day she saw the person? I’d be interested to know if Le asked her what made her certain she saw the guy at X time (I don’t remember what time she gave) and how was she sure it was the 13th vs any other day?
I’m hoping that she called and said she believed she saw a guy on the 13th and that police didn’t suggest this date to her with a leading question. Eg: big diff between:
Witness - hi, I saw a guy leaving the area in the 13th.
Cop: ok what can you tell me about what you saw?
W: he was blah blah blah…
C: ok you said you saw him on the 13th?
W: yea
C: and you’re sure?
W: yea
C: what makes you sure it was the 13th?
W: I was coming home from work, and I just got a gift for vday for my man as I was to see him on the 14th for lunch…
And
W: I saw a guy around the time the kids were found dead
C: ok? Did you see him on the 13th or 14th
W: yeah I think it was on the 13th maybe?
C: ok. So you saw him on the 13th….
In this example she isn’t sure when she saw him. He suggests two options and she goes with one of them.
C: so you’re sure it was the 13?
W: I think so.
And he doesn’t ask how she is sure or she gives a wobbly answer? I think it’s cannon fodder for the defence depending on what they asked, how long after etc… and what she answered and how.
Note: the above is only an example of the diff ways the witness may have been questioned. These are not facts nor based on facts.