Abby & Libby - The Delphi Murders - Richard Allen Arrested - #191

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Indiana statute

Whenever a defendant in a criminal case intends to offer in his defense evidence of alibi, the defendant shall, no later than:

(1) twenty (20) days prior to the omnibus date if the defendant is charged with a felony;
What does omnibus date mean in Indiana?


The Court will set an Omnibus Hearing before the trial date. The Omnibus Hearing typically does not require the presence of the Defendant. The Omnibus Hearing is essentially a date by which certain pleadings and motions must be filed by the Defendant instead of a date that you must appear in court.

Criminal Case Expectations - Scott County, Indiana​


Scott County, Indiana (.gov)
https://www.scottcounty.in.gov › topic





 
Sounds like a perfectly reasonable place to end up if Abby was told to put Libby's clothes on. It either fell out or she found it and hide it...most likely the former. MOO
Strangely I had never thought of this but of course you are right, the phone could have been in Libby’s jeans or jacket pocket, transferred to Abby as she dressed in the clothes and ended up underneath her. And their murderer may have not seen it at all.
 
As a woman, if I saw a man bloody/muddy, then I'm afraid I wouldn’t stop.

He must have been in a right old state and I wouldn’t risk my own safety to help a random person. It’s just as well she didn’t offer him help either considering what crimes he had just committed. He may have even tried to harm her if he thought she could recognise him as a witness.

Moo
I absolutely would not stop, especially if it's a grown man walking on his own. A grown man walking doesn't need me stopping to ask if he's okay. Now, if he was trying to flag down cars or was stumbling or struggling, I would call 911.

I would very likely remember the details, though - even more so if I learned about something important like missing/murdered kids happened in the same area.

jmopinion
 
Strangely I had never thought of this but of course you are right, the phone could have been in Libby’s jeans or jacket pocket, transferred to Abby as she dressed in the clothes and ended up underneath her. And their murderer may have not seen it at all.
Yes, that does make sense. I'm thinking it might have been in her hoodie pocket.

jmo
 
The information comes direct from the FBI, law enforcement and the states own discovery. I would hardly call referring to their own work detailing the first 2.5+ years of their investigation as a “conspiracy”.

It’s a slippery slope if we believe the state is lying and fabricated documents detailing 2.5+ years of their own investigation and that the FBI agents and LE testifying about their own work are lying (and for what reason?). Where do the lies end ?

MOO
It sure did come from them. And, it was investigated.

And their experts ruled out Ritual sacrifice. And people were ruled out as suspects. Even the investigators testified that they could not place the suspects at the bridge for the murders and had no evidence of them being there. Alibies.

That theory only carries on because some D-Team believe that LE and the FBI and their experts and witnesses, and bosses, and co-workers etc are conspiring to lie to frame up RA instead.

That's the conspiracy theory that now needs to be put to bed. The Odinist Ritual Sacrifice lie needs to end.
 
It sure did come from them. And, it was investigated.

And their experts ruled out Ritual sacrifice. And people were ruled out as suspects. Even the investigators testified that they could not place the suspects at the bridge for the murders and had no evidence of them being there. Alibies.

That theory only carries on because some D-Team believe that LE and the FBI and their experts and witnesses, and bosses, and co-workers etc are conspiring to lie to frame up RA instead.

That's the conspiracy theory that now needs to be put to bed. The Odinist Ritual Sacrifice lie needs to end.


Yes and I am baffled by a conspiracy that literally involves children and 100’s of other people and not a single whistleblower.

Moo
 
The lady who saw the man leaving the area who was "muddy / bloody" (depending on which version of documents one wants to go with. I wonder what else was going on for her as she drove past that may have had her attention? I wonder if perhaps she was so focused on whomever she saw that she maybe missed other things going on at the time? EG: other car(s) or persons? Here is a link to help explain what I'm on about: Inattentional blindness - Wikipedia
The Harvester Store camera must have missed them too.
 
Approx 21 mins in, the Murdersheet give an example of how the defence intentionally sought to mislead the public in it's original Franks filing

As we know from the hearings last week, FBI BAU reached the conclusion that the crime scene is not a ritualistic murder scene. The Franks said the opposite.

The slight of hand was achieved by quoting Click saying FBI BAU thought that, rather than the primary conclusion from FBI BAU.

This is why you can't simply trust that the defence was accurately representing the materials hidden behind the footnotes ....

 
It sure did come from them. And, it was investigated.

And their experts ruled out Ritual sacrifice. And people were ruled out as suspects. Even the investigators testified that they could not place the suspects at the bridge for the murders and had no evidence of them being there. Alibies.

That theory only carries on because some D-Team believe that LE and the FBI and their experts and witnesses, and bosses, and co-workers etc are conspiring to lie to frame up RA instead.

That's the conspiracy theory that now needs to be put to bed. The Odinist Ritual Sacrifice lie needs to end.

Yes and the conspiracy theories are supported with no more proof than the original sayso theory - imaginary speculation. Any outside party who implicated an Odin involvement is deemed unquestionably honest and truthful. Everyone involved in the alibis is a lying untrustworthy scoundrel.

IMO it’s gotten to a point that RA would be so lucky for the Judge to throw out all talk of it because a defense theory so desperately ridiculous could potentially turn the jury against him, over a disregard to the actual evidence.

MOO and JMO
 
Yes and the conspiracy theories are supported with no more proof than the original sayso theory - imaginary speculation. Any outside party who implicated an Odin involvement is deemed unquestionably honest and truthful. Everyone involved in the alibis is a lying untrustworthy scoundrel.

IMO it’s gotten to a point that RA would be so lucky for the Judge to throw out all talk of it because a defense theory so desperately ridiculous could potentially turn the jury against him, over a disregard to the actual evidence.

MOO and JMO
Whatever the judge rules about admission, I also have faith that if bunk is allowed, the jury will recognize it as bunk and disregard it.

Jurors are allowed to use their judgement and common sense, and I trust their common sense when weighing the EVIDENCE that will be presented against the defendant. Juries like EVIDENCE.

Some segments of the public might be fooled into believing conspiracies, but the jury with evidence presented to them won't be fooled, imo. I have faith.

jmo
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
112
Guests online
2,022
Total visitors
2,134

Forum statistics

Threads
601,517
Messages
18,125,679
Members
231,079
Latest member
pellepellestore
Back
Top