Someone being arrested doesn’t mean they’re guilty, or there wouldnt be a “not guilty” option for a jury. RA simply being arrested doesn’t prove he did anything. The evidence is supposed to prove the states case per their theory. Simply believing that a person is guilty because they were arrested isn’t “innocent until proven guilty”. It’s siding with the prosecution just because they’re the prosecution.
The states case is currently contradictory eyewitness statements, somehow matching an unspent round matched to a fired cartridge casing(?) and a series of potentially incriminating statements made after months of solitary confinement at a maximum security prison. Add in the hidden/missing/destroyed evidence and what do we really know about the totality of the investigation. What else is missing?
None of the known evidence says RA did anything, especially beyond a reasonable doubt. So right now I believe that RA is the unluckiest person ever to come forward to provide a witness statement and get thrown in prison without a trial for a crime without any real evidence connecting him to the crime scene or the victims.
MOO
BBM
Well this is simply not true
There is plenty of evidence that would suggest he is the right man, right down to the grainy video and the fact he can be placed on the bridge dressed remarkably similar to BG moments before the girls crossed.
Also, of course, not forgetting his gun, managed to eject a cartridge in the middle of the crime scene. I don’t recall a bunch of other random bullets being found at the crime scene. Just the one from his gun that he pulled on the girls at the end of the bridge which can be heard on the audio.
IMHO