Not surprised but seeing it in B&W will bring Justice one step closer for Abby & Libby IMO.
Jury can hear Richard Allen's alleged confessions to Delphi murders
Special Judge Frances Gull has ruled that a jury can hear Allen's alleged confessions to the murders of Libby Germany and Abby Williams.www.wthr.com
The confessions are admissible
Oh boy!!!!
Catching up... jumped in wherever I landed on arrival so this may have been covered... did JG finally rule on SODDI of Odins? Or... still no word? ty
Just a note... anyone can add a watermark to whatever they want to. Doesn't mean really anything... you can also remove them a lot of the time with ease as well if you wanted to, or wanted to put your own instead...
Is tomorrow her deadline on that (does she have 3 days from the conclusion of the pre-trials or...?)
GP's can write scrips for anti depressants.
IANAL but I don't believe the judge has a deadline to rule on anything.
Convicted child killers don't fare very well in prison. He'll still be segregated from gen pop due to the high public nature of this case.
But are you going to travel that far away from Delphi, to Greencastle on the other side of Indianapolis, to see a GP for that?
| 08/29/2024 | Order Issued The Court, having had this matter under advisement following a hearing conducted on July 31, 2024, on the Defendant's Motion to Suppress Statements (filed April 11, 2024), the State's Objection to Defendant's Motion to Suppress Filed April 11, 2024 (filed April 23, 2024), the State's Motion to Dismiss the Motion to Suppress Filed April 11, 2024 (filed May 17, 2024), and the State's Motion for Admissibility (filed May 6, 2024), and having considered the witnesses' testimony, the exhibits admitted into evidence, the arguments of counsel, and the applicable statutes and case law, now grants the State's Request for Pre-Trial Ruling on Admissibility pursuant to I.C. 25-33-1-17. The statements given by defendant to Dr. Monica H. Wala, Psy.D., are not privileged based upon the exception noted in the Statute, "(1) Trials for homicide when the disclosure relates directly to the fact or immediate circumstances of said homicide." All statements given by defendant to Dr. Wala are admissible in the trial. Defendant's arguments to the contrary go to the weight the jury would give such statements, not their admissibility. Having taken the State's Motion to Dismiss the Motion to Suppress Filed April 11, 2024 under advisement at the hearing, the Court agrees with the State that the defendant has failed to comply with the Criminal Rules of Procedure by neglecting to clearly state which specific statements he is seeking to suppress, nor the legal basis for the suppression. Despite these deficiencies, the Court has been able to determine that the statements given to the defendant's family members were voluntary, not coerced by any State action, and were not made under threats of violence, or improper influence. Although the Defendant is clearly in custody, he initiated the communication with his family and was not subject to custodial interrogation when he spoke to this family. Further, the statements given by defendant to the correctional officers, inmate companions, the Warden, mental health personnel, medical personnel, and the Indiana State Police were unsolicited by any of those individuals and were voluntarily given without coercion or interrogation. The defendant has not shown that he suffered from psychological coercion by the State which caused him to make these statements. To the contrary, the evidence shows he specifically sought out the Warden by written communication he initiated, and verbal statements he offered to guards, inmate companions, mental health professionals, and medical personnel. The defendant has failed to show any of these statements were the result of coercive interrogation by the State, or that they were the result of his pre-trial detention. The totality of the circumstances of defendant's pre-trial detention were not intended to force confessions from the defendant. The defendant's pre-trial detention is to protect him from harm. The Court is not persuaded that the detention caused the defendant to make incriminating statements. While the defendant does suffer from major depressive disorder and anxiety, those are not serious mental illnesses that prevent the defendant from making voluntary statements. The Court finds the statements given by the defendant to Dr. Wala, the Warden, inmates, guards, medical personnel, mental health professionals, and law enforcement personnel were not coerced, were voluntary, were not the result of interrogation by the State or its actors, nor the product of his confinement and, therefore, denies the defendant's Motion to Suppress Statements filed April 11, 2024. Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Noticed: McLeland, Nicholas Charles Noticed: Baldwin, Andrew Joseph Noticed: Rozzi, Bradley Anthony Noticed: Luttrull, James David JR Noticed: Diener, Stacey Lynn Noticed: Auger, Jennifer Jones Order Signed: |
And there it is. So where do we go from here?
Interesting question
Saying he was under withdrawals from his prescription meds when he started confessing? Idk
The letter RA sent to the Warden requesting to confess to him face to face, and the Warden's response of reporting it and turning down the meeting, is IMO going to be a rather large pebble on the BARD / muting the whispers of conspiracy pile.
