ClearAhead
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2024
- Messages
- 440
- Reaction score
- 5,211
They did nothing
IMO it also illustrates the point made by the P that the purpose of the D’s motions is to fuel SM with the notion of ‘poor, woeful, wrongfully accused RA’ instead of presenting legal and factually sound arguments to the court in his defense.
They let RA down once again by not categorizing or specifying which confessions they sought to have dismissed so now all are allowed in.
I have no respect for attorneys who land a high profile case as public defenders and go on to try to hoodwink the public into thinking they’re working hard to defend the ‘little guy’.
MOO and JMO