Abby & Libby - The Delphi Murders - Richard Allen Arrested - #195

[susiQ]

The gg may’ve been expensed long before RA’s arrest. It was an expense by LE related to the Delphi murder case, not RAs arrest.

RSBM
Well, if the $$ were spent prior to RA’s arrest, I would have to conclude that RA’s family tree did not show up. Firstly, it was not part of the PCA, secondly R & B have stated that there is no DNA evidence linking RA to the CS. As well, Tony L and JH testified to this fact during their individual depositions. Nada, nothing. RA’s DNA was not there. Period. But someone’s was. And since any family DNA would be discounted, it may be a mystery forever.
All MOO.
FM Pg 129

FINAL DRAFT - 9.17 at 6.30 pm - Delphi Franks brief.pdf | PDF Host

PDF Host read free online - FINAL DRAFT - 9.17 at 6.30 pm - Delphi Franks brief.pdf - ANDREW J. BALDWIN

pdfhost.io

 

[ClearAhead]

RSBM
And, some of us don’t quite get “imagining” that the P has some bombshell that will allow them to reach BARD. Is there a source that the P has some bombshell evidence they are going to spring on us at trial? It is repeated often here on these threads.

The truth is, we’re all here speculating on what we do know. The rest we must patiently wait for . MOO

Yes hopefully all the answers to what we don’t know now will become clear during the trial.

Frankly I don’t recall it suggested that the P has bombshell evidence, just that the PCA was the simply basis to RA’s arrest, nothing more. It was not intended to serve as a summary of the State’s case. They’ve been diligent in honouring the gag order by disclosing only as much as required in response to D motions. But anything further to that is unknown. MOO

 

[Spartygirl]

There was testimony regarding this from the hearings in July/August. I am looking for a link atm.

Ohh-- I hadn't heard of that before either and would like to see the link please.
I always believe the FBI was behind most of that presser and helped construct it.

 

[susiQ]

Yes hopefully all the answers to what we don’t know now will become clear during the trial.

Frankly I don’t recall it suggested that the P has bombshell evidence, just that the PCA was the simply basis to RA’s arrest, nothing more. It was not intended to serve as a summary of the State’s case. They’ve been diligent in honouring the gag order by disclosing only as much as required in response to D motions. But anything further to that is unknown. MOO

Granted, the word “bombshell” is overstating it, but I have read enough on these threads where it is asserted, and rather confidently at that, that the P has SO much more than what’s in the PCA. Well, I’m not convinced in the least that that is the case. If this were in fact “fact” the D would know it and they wouldn’t be telling everyone that their client is innocent. Oh yes, that’s what ALL defense attorneys do, I know! But, I without a doubt believe they mean it. Lebrato meant it. They do not believe RA killed A & L. In Lebrato’s case, you could hear it in his voice, see it in his eyes and general demeanour during this interview with BM. It was palpable. IMO

My hope is that the truth will be exposed and the real killers will be brought to justice. I’m not certain that will or can happen. The evil ones that did what they did to those poor girls that day are a special kind of evil. Empty vessels. No feelings of guilt or remorse. Wouldn’t lose a night’s sleep over what they did. IMO

As often is the case on these threads, we’ll just have to agree to disagree.

All MOO