Nope because he doesn’t have one
Would have liked to be a fly on the wall during his last interview.
IME criminals always struggle with what they're not supposed to know.
I picture LE conversing with RA, getting a rhythm for how he answers factual questions. He DID have an alibi for portions of that day. How well did he recall those? Awaken, shower, dress, breakfast. Phone use. What was he doing at 8 am, 10 am, noon? 5 pm? 7 pm? No details? Too many details? Typical phone usage? Atypical pattern? Airplane mode, off, evidence of user engagement with device? Any gaps? Why?
I suspect eventually we'll learn that his explanations/adjustments had to do with questions asked and the art of presplaining, resplaining.
What time were you there? Witness saw your likeness around 2 pm, victim filmed your likeness at 2:13.
If AW and LG were walking toward the MHB and you were on the platform/path, how did you not see them? Oh, I was looking at my phone, that must be why.
New invention: left at 1:30.
Probably got there at noon and left
about 1:30.
Okay, where did you go after that? Who saw you? Receipts? Phone confirmation? IME criminals have a hard time making up credible actions and dialogue for black-out periods in their day (cellphone usage).
Did RA work that morning? Work at all that day? When and how did he use his phone? Outside of MHB what verification does he have, to account for the rest of his day?
Does he have a cellphone that puts him on the bridge at ANY time that day?
Does he have a cellphone that confirms accessing a stock ticker at any time that day?
If so, when? If not, why?
Either way, he's boxed in.
JMO
