Actually, another question - how would they actually access the property where the girls bodies were found? Would they drive down a distance in a bus or private cars or just walk??? So many questions!!
bbm
Goodness! I hope there aren't any elderly people on the jury!
I guess they’d have to ask about potential juror’s ability / willingness to hike these places to ensure or at least try to ensure that any jurors who make it to the trial are up for the task?
The old CPS/Welfare building doesn't exist anymore either.
Post in thread 'Abby & Libby - The Delphi Murders - Richard Allen Arrested - #196' Abby & Libby - The Delphi Murders - Richard Allen Arrested - #196
I'm surprised to see this from the defense team. I wonder what they're trying to show the jury.
Thanks. I checked that and it doesn’t indicate that the kids clothes were found there - just that some things were found there. You noted as well you can’t link to the claim that it was the kids clothes because your source for this is not approved. I appreciate your effort here though and am familiar with the not approved link. I was just wondering / hoping there was an approved confirmation of it is all.
The items in the helicopter footage (although far away) are in the same position as the up close items you are aware of. Thanks for hearing me out. I believe we will hear evidence/confirmation of this at trial.
I don’t disagree they’re in the same spot… it would make *sense* that these belonged to the kids… I’m sure we get confirmation at some point in trial… just wasn’t sure if we had it *yet* - all good. No worries!
His safety is not guaranteed, and I don't mean stumbling over a tree root, IMO. So RA will be left "home alone", I assume.
I can't speak for other people but the stick and the mulch are the exact same shape and all three items of clothing are in the same spots.
I believe - if the jury attends the scene he has a legal right to be there - bc it’s his trial. My belief stems from the way the motion is worded. It says something about he will waive if he can’t be there. Paraphrased of course - I think the D knows he isn’t likely going to be granted permission to attend due to security risks etc so they noted up front they’re fine to waive his right to be there up front. Again, not a lawyer, just moo and a guess.
Not a lawyer either lol but I highly doubt that JG will allow the jury to visit bridge/crime scene, but I digress.
I am curious if RA would go to the scene with everyone? I can't recall in past trials if the accused goes along on these trips or not.
Oh this reminds me that there was that women's beach cruiser bike sitting outside at the Murdaughs house when the jury when to view it. I think it was "staged" if I am remembering right. I just found it all odd. I understand going there can give you a feel for things especially when one side is saying one thing happened and the other side is trying to paint a different picture.
The way I read the document, the Defense is conceding the point -- proactively asking to waive his right to be there.
