meta
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2008
- Messages
- 25
- Reaction score
- 0
I'm not sure I completely understand the moral/ethical issue here.
On the one hand, you have a family that's been completely destroyed over the apparent murder of their child/grandchild. But despite that, the bills and other obligations don't away.
On the other hand, you have a "public" who watches the new... ne...nu.. tabloid TV-pseudo "news" and demands of these tabloids to provide interviews, videos, pictures, comments and web-cam shots of this family.
But once we hear that the owners/sponsors of the tabloid psuedo-news programs are compensating the family for their time... we blame the family?
From where do you think these tabloids and networks get their money to pay families like the A's for their time in the spotlight?
On the one hand, you have a family that's been completely destroyed over the apparent murder of their child/grandchild. But despite that, the bills and other obligations don't away.
On the other hand, you have a "public" who watches the new... ne...nu.. tabloid TV-pseudo "news" and demands of these tabloids to provide interviews, videos, pictures, comments and web-cam shots of this family.
But once we hear that the owners/sponsors of the tabloid psuedo-news programs are compensating the family for their time... we blame the family?
From where do you think these tabloids and networks get their money to pay families like the A's for their time in the spotlight?