I think the judge has already OK'ed it, apparently it is the judge's discretion to allow it or not.
Link, please?
I think the judge has already OK'ed it, apparently it is the judge's discretion to allow it or not.
I am a first time poster and I have a thought/question. In his closing argument, JM called out ALV as lying during testimony. The DT never objected. I have never known of a defense "expert" allowed to be classified as this even in closing arguments. I am assuming that her entire testimony was impeached in chambers by JSS and that opened the door for JM to openly remark that she lied before the jury?
Link, please?
I wish the Alexander family all the best. but I see this also as a lifetime of pain.cause no matter what, cases will appear similar to what happen to Travis Alexander and the family will again have open wounds . Jodi gave this family a life sentence of pain. I doubt the CFJA have any remourse, her enjoyment is she feels joy in watching the Alexander family suffer.. the best thing for the Alexander family is if there is someway through court is to stop this CFJA from ever uttering a word in the public ever again. if not, all I see is CFJA hounding them with her tweets and getting interviewed to spew hate towards them..
I am a first time poster and I have a thought/question. In his closing argument, JM called out ALV as lying during testimony. The DT never objected. I have never known of a defense "expert" allowed to be classified as this even in closing arguments. I am assuming that her entire testimony was impeached in chambers by JSS and that opened the door for JM to openly remark that she lied before the jury?
I am a first time poster and I have a thought/question. In his closing argument, JM called out ALV as lying during testimony. The DT never objected. I have never known of a defense "expert" allowed to be classified as this even in closing arguments. I am assuming that her entire testimony was impeached in chambers by JSS and that opened the door for JM to openly remark that she lied before the jury?
Why??? Why is she different? Jodi must have requested that then?
I think it's a Maricopa County thing. Either the judge or maybe Sheriff Joe makes the decision. At last something CFJA doesn't get to rule on.
If the let her wear street clothes, I hope she at least will be shackled. Kinda hard to have that smug smirk on her face with all the hardware. :twocents:
I don't have a link, sorry, it was on HLN, JVM was interviewing someone from the sheriff's office during verdict watch and she asked him about the clothes if the trial went into the next phase.
Why??? Why is she different? Jodi must have requested that then?