gitana1
Verified Attorney
- Joined
- May 31, 2005
- Messages
- 29,412
- Reaction score
- 230,368
Near as I can tell the motion was simply filed, not approved. Am I wrong?
In what way is the judge taking her side? Please explain.
It's just been filed. There has been no ruling yet and i doubt she will get her way.
Here is the latest DT motion for your perusal.
Well, the victim impact statements occur at sentencing, after the jury is finished. So I'm not sure what arias' angle is except to avoid having to face the family she destroyed.
I actuaally think the motion to have such statements be via video is one the victims may make if they are out of town or can't get to the court. But I think jodi is trying to use a motion designed to make life easier for victims to avoid facing what she has done!
Well color me confused. I read the motion - thanks Beagle - but it acts as if victim impact statements may affect the jury. Yet here's the code: http://statutes.laws.com/arizona/title13/13-4426_2
It shows that such statements are made at sentencing, which the judge does after the jury reaches its decision. I don't get it. AZLawyer, where are you?