April 7, 2026, 4:32 p.m. ET
Paul Caneiro's guilt in murders was 'overwhelming,' prosecutors say
FREEHOLD - Prosecutors have countered Paul Caneiro's claims he was denied a fair trial in the murders of four family members, arguing in a response filed April 6 that the verdict, delivered on Feb. 13 after three hours of deliberations in a seven-week trial, showed jurors were convinced no one else committed the crimes.
In a brief responding to Caneiro's motion for a new trial, Monmouth County Prosecutor Raymond S. Santiago, Deputy First Assistant Prosecutor Christopher Decker and Assistant Prosecutor Nicole Wallace denied Caneiro's allegations he was unfairly prejudiced by denigrating remarks and other statements made by prosecutors and Superior Court Judge Marc C. Lemieux during his trial.
Caneiro, 59, of Ocean Township, claimed in the motion for a new trial filed last month that Decker and Lemieux unfairly denigrated his defense attorneys and made other statements that deprived him of a fair trial in the 2018 murders in Colts Neck of his brother, sister-in-law, and young niece and nephew.
The chief defense argument that Lemieux denigrated and berated Caneiro's attorneys by being impatient, critical and hostile only toward them and not prosecutors is "without merit,” the prosecution's brief said. The prosecutors said the judge was attempting to try the case expeditiously, while the defense attorneys' lengthy cross-examination of witnesses was "riddled with” repetitive and irrelevant questions.
The prosecution's brief also disputed allegations that Decker denigrated the defense attorneys and made other improper statements to the jury during his summation.
"The State submits that the evidence of defendant's guilt was overwhelming,” the prosecutors said in their brief. "The jury deliberated for, likely, around three hours, despite this being a seven-week trial with approximately a day and a half of summations. Clearly, the jury was convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant, and no one else, committed these crimes.”
Lemieux has scheduled a hearing on Caneiro's motion for a new trial for April 20.
In a case that garnered widespread media attention, Caneiro stood trial before Lemieux beginning in January. On Feb. 13, the jury found him guilty of the murders of his brother, Keith Caneiro, 50, sister-in-law Jennifer Caneiro, 45, and the couple's two children, 11-year-old son Jesse and 8-year-old daughter Sophia. The panel also found him guilty of 11 additional counts in the indictment, including weapons offenses, theft and two counts of aggravated arson.
Decker and Wallace argued at trial that the defendant committed the murders at the victims' Colts Neck mansion on Nov. 20, 2018, and set the home on fire to cover them up. They said Paul Caneiro's motive was that Keith Caneiro, his business partner, had discovered he was stealing from him.
The prosecutors argued that Paul Caneiro returned to his home and set it on fire in an unsuccessful attempt to destroy evidence later found in his basement, including bloody jeans that had the slain children's DNA on them.
Defense attorneys argued detectives failed to investigate others who may have committed the crimes, including the defendant's youngest brother, Corey Caneiro.
The killings shattered the serenity of wealthy, rural Colts Neck, when emergency workers discovered the victims' bodies as a massive fire consumed their mansion on Willow Brook Road.
Keith Caneiro had been shot four times in the head and once in the back. Jennifer and the children were stabbed repeatedly and badly burned. Jennifer also had been shot in the head, and Jesse had been grazed by a bullet.
Defense attorneys Monika Mastellone and Andy Murray, in their motion for a new trial, accused Lemieux of denigrating them in and out of the presence of the jury. The defense attorneys claimed the judge chastised them and exhibited anger by pointing and scowling at them and squeezing a stress ball.
In response, the prosecutors acknowledged the judge had to rule on numerous objections raised by both sides during the trial.
"The Court's comments to defense counsel were neither denigrating nor hostile,” the prosecution's brief said. "Rather, the Court's comments were focused on ensuring that the case was tried in an expeditious manner, that the jury understood the evidence, and that the Rules of Evidence were followed by the parties.
"The State would be remiss if it did not point out that during the course of the trial, defense counsel's lengthy questioning of witnesses was riddled with repetitive questions that had been asked and answered multiple times; questions that were not relevant; questions that called for speculation and/or hearsay; and in one instance, a blatant discovery violation that arose during the defense's case-in-chief,” the prosecutors wrote in their brief.
"The fact that the defense repeatedly chose to step outside the Rules of Evidence to such an extent that the Court was left with no choice but to address same on multiple occasions does not equate to unfair criticism of the defense,” they wrote.
The prosecution's brief also denied accusations that Decker denigrated the defense attorneys and made other improper statements to the jury in his summation.
"The State never denigrated the defense or the defendant with personal attacks; it simply pointed out when their arguments were not supported by the evidence or, in its opinion, based in reality,” the prosecution's brief said.
"If the totality of the State's summation was 'prejudicial,' it was not because it was improper, but simply because the evidence overwhelmingly proved that defendant murdered the four victims, set fire to two homes and then tried to cover it up,” the prosecutors wrote.
https://www.app.com/story/news/loca...ming-state-says-of-new-trial-bid/89505156007/