• #281
So - anyone think that this April 20th hearing replaces the April 8th hearing?
I don't think so. April 8 is a charge conference on PC's pending Insurance fraud charge-- which is unrelated to the Motions hearing for a new trial (scheduled for April 20).

Caneiro still faces another charge of insurance fraud, but Decker told the judge on March 18 that the state may not prosecute that case.

Caneiro in that case is accused of collecting unemployment insurance for injuries he suffered in a car accident while continuing to work, with his compensation being paid to his wife.

Decker said the issue in that case is restitution to the three insurance companies, although only one so far is seeking a claim, and whether Caneiro, looking at life in prison, will have the ability to pay any restitution.
 
  • #282
I don't think so. April 8 is a charge conference on PC's pending Insurance fraud charge-- which is unrelated to the Motions hearing for a new trial (scheduled for April 20).

Okay - thanks for the reply. I couldn't make heads or tails out of that one! :)
 
  • #283
Okay - thanks for the reply. I couldn't make heads or tails out of that one! :)

Paul is like Kouri Richins-- convicted of murder but still has multiple fraud charges pending after he defrauded three insurance companies.

The DA will likely announce the State dropping the fraud charges against Paul during the charge conference on 4/8/26 because only one of the three Insurers defrauded filed for restitution from Paul. In other words, if Paul receives multiple life sentences for the murders-- this will eliminate his ability to make restitution.
 
  • #284
I forgot about this but just reminded that there were also civil suits brought against Paul including a 2020 wrongful death by his victims-- his late sister-in-law Jennifer for certain.

I don't know if the plaintiff(s) did anything here to preserve liquidation proceeds of Paul's assets-- including any joint assets Paul had at the time of the 2020 lawsuit. I don't have any idea if Paul is still married. We know he was at the time of the murders.

 
  • #285
  • #286

April 7, 2026, 4:32 p.m. ET

Paul Caneiro's guilt in murders was 'overwhelming,' prosecutors say​

FREEHOLD - Prosecutors have countered Paul Caneiro's claims he was denied a fair trial in the murders of four family members, arguing in a response filed April 6 that the verdict, delivered on Feb. 13 after three hours of deliberations in a seven-week trial, showed jurors were convinced no one else committed the crimes.

In a brief responding to Caneiro's motion for a new trial, Monmouth County Prosecutor Raymond S. Santiago, Deputy First Assistant Prosecutor Christopher Decker and Assistant Prosecutor Nicole Wallace denied Caneiro's allegations he was unfairly prejudiced by denigrating remarks and other statements made by prosecutors and Superior Court Judge Marc C. Lemieux during his trial.

Caneiro, 59, of Ocean Township, claimed in the motion for a new trial filed last month that Decker and Lemieux unfairly denigrated his defense attorneys and made other statements that deprived him of a fair trial in the 2018 murders in Colts Neck of his brother, sister-in-law, and young niece and nephew.

The chief defense argument that Lemieux denigrated and berated Caneiro's attorneys by being impatient, critical and hostile only toward them and not prosecutors is "without merit,” the prosecution's brief said. The prosecutors said the judge was attempting to try the case expeditiously, while the defense attorneys' lengthy cross-examination of witnesses was "riddled with” repetitive and irrelevant questions.

The prosecution's brief also disputed allegations that Decker denigrated the defense attorneys and made other improper statements to the jury during his summation.

"The State submits that the evidence of defendant's guilt was overwhelming,” the prosecutors said in their brief. "The jury deliberated for, likely, around three hours, despite this being a seven-week trial with approximately a day and a half of summations. Clearly, the jury was convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant, and no one else, committed these crimes.”

Lemieux has scheduled a hearing on Caneiro's motion for a new trial for April 20.

In a case that garnered widespread media attention, Caneiro stood trial before Lemieux beginning in January. On Feb. 13, the jury found him guilty of the murders of his brother, Keith Caneiro, 50, sister-in-law Jennifer Caneiro, 45, and the couple's two children, 11-year-old son Jesse and 8-year-old daughter Sophia. The panel also found him guilty of 11 additional counts in the indictment, including weapons offenses, theft and two counts of aggravated arson.


Decker and Wallace argued at trial that the defendant committed the murders at the victims' Colts Neck mansion on Nov. 20, 2018, and set the home on fire to cover them up. They said Paul Caneiro's motive was that Keith Caneiro, his business partner, had discovered he was stealing from him.

The prosecutors argued that Paul Caneiro returned to his home and set it on fire in an unsuccessful attempt to destroy evidence later found in his basement, including bloody jeans that had the slain children's DNA on them.

Defense attorneys argued detectives failed to investigate others who may have committed the crimes, including the defendant's youngest brother, Corey Caneiro.

The killings shattered the serenity of wealthy, rural Colts Neck, when emergency workers discovered the victims' bodies as a massive fire consumed their mansion on Willow Brook Road.

Keith Caneiro had been shot four times in the head and once in the back. Jennifer and the children were stabbed repeatedly and badly burned. Jennifer also had been shot in the head, and Jesse had been grazed by a bullet.

Defense attorneys Monika Mastellone and Andy Murray, in their motion for a new trial, accused Lemieux of denigrating them in and out of the presence of the jury. The defense attorneys claimed the judge chastised them and exhibited anger by pointing and scowling at them and squeezing a stress ball.

In response, the prosecutors acknowledged the judge had to rule on numerous objections raised by both sides during the trial.

"The Court's comments to defense counsel were neither denigrating nor hostile,” the prosecution's brief said. "Rather, the Court's comments were focused on ensuring that the case was tried in an expeditious manner, that the jury understood the evidence, and that the Rules of Evidence were followed by the parties.

"The State would be remiss if it did not point out that during the course of the trial, defense counsel's lengthy questioning of witnesses was riddled with repetitive questions that had been asked and answered multiple times; questions that were not relevant; questions that called for speculation and/or hearsay; and in one instance, a blatant discovery violation that arose during the defense's case-in-chief,” the prosecutors wrote in their brief.

"The fact that the defense repeatedly chose to step outside the Rules of Evidence to such an extent that the Court was left with no choice but to address same on multiple occasions does not equate to unfair criticism of the defense,” they wrote.

The prosecution's brief also denied accusations that Decker denigrated the defense attorneys and made other improper statements to the jury in his summation.

"The State never denigrated the defense or the defendant with personal attacks; it simply pointed out when their arguments were not supported by the evidence or, in its opinion, based in reality,” the prosecution's brief said.

"If the totality of the State's summation was 'prejudicial,' it was not because it was improper, but simply because the evidence overwhelmingly proved that defendant murdered the four victims, set fire to two homes and then tried to cover it up,” the prosecutors wrote.

https://www.app.com/story/news/loca...ming-state-says-of-new-trial-bid/89505156007/
 
Last edited:
  • #287
Wednesday, April 8th:
*Motions Hearing (to dismiss charges re insurance fraud) (@ 8:30am ET) – NJ – Keith Martin Caneiro (50), his wife Jennifer Karidis Caneiro (45) & 2 children Jesse (11) & Sophia (8) (Nov. 20, 2018, Colt’s1Neck; died prior to fire @ home) – *Paul Jay Caneiro (51/now 59) (bro) arrested (11/20/18), charged (11/29/18), indicted (2/25/19) & arraigned (3/18/19) on 4 counts of murder, 2 counts of felony murder, 2 counts of aggravated arson, possession of a firearm for an unlawful purpose, possession of a knife for an unlawful purpose, unlawful possession of a firearm, unlawful possession of a knife, theft, misapplication of entrusted property & 2 counts of hindering apprehension. Plead not guilty. Held without bond. Monmouth County
*Indicted (7/1/19) & arraigned (3/18/19) with 2nd degree insurance fraud (from 11/6/12 to 7/9/19). Plead not guilty.
Paul Caneiro allegedly stole $78K from Keith & Jennifer Caneiro. He stole the money sometime between January 2017 & the day of the murders.
Jury selection began on 1/5/26 & ended on 1/9/26. 12 jurors & 4 alternates.
Trial began on 1/12/26 & State rested their case on 2/6/26. Defense began their case on 2/6/26 & rested their case on 2/10/26.
Closing arguments from 2/11/26 to 2/12/26. Jury started deliberations on 2/12/26 @ 8:30am & ending @ 1:30pm [~5 hours] with a GUILTY VERDICT on all 15 counts charged.
Sentencing hearing on 5/12/26.
Superior Court Judge Marc C. Lemieux presiding. Monmouth County Prosecutor Deputy First assistant Christopher Decker & Assistant Monmouth County prosecutor Nicole Wallace. Public defender’s office attorneys Monika Mastellone & Andy Murray.

Court info from 11/28/18 thru 12/4/25 r& Jury Selection Days 1-5 (1/5-1/9/26) & Trial Days 1-19 (1/12-2/12/26-no trial on 2/5/26) reference post #252 here:
https://websleuths.com/threads/nj-m...olts-neck-20-nov-2018-arrest-2.740776/page-14

2/13/26 Friday, Trial Day 20: Jury started deliberations @ 8:30am. About 40 minutes later, they requested to view video of a vehicle the defendant allegedly drove on the night of the killings. And took less than five hours to find Caneiro GUILTY in the brutal & shocking murders of his brother’s family in their Colts Neck home in 2018. Caneiro is scheduled to be sentenced on 5/12/26. Defendant's motion for a new trial due by 2/23/26. Defendant's brief due by 3/16/26 @ 4:30pm. State's response due by 4/6/26 @ 4:30pm. Hearing on any motion for new trial 4/20/26 @ 8:30am.
2/23/26 Update: Caneiro’s defense attorneys, Monika Mastellone & Andy Murray filed the motion for new trial on 2/23/26.indicating he's planning to appeal his guilty verdict. A request for new trial will be determined by Judge Lemieux. If he denies the request, Caneiro can then appeal the jury’s verdict.
3/16/26 Update: Attorneys for Paul Caneiro are seeking to toss his convictions in the murders of four family members & related crimes, claiming the judge's & prosecutor's denigration of the defense attorneys in front of a jury deprived their client of a fair trial. In addition, the defense attorneys assert they were unfairly denied access to information submitted by prosecutors to the judge about the person at the center of their defense - the defendant's youngest brother, Corey Caneiro, who the defense portrayed as a potential perpetrator of the 2018 murders in Colts Neck. A 45-page brief submitted by the defense on March 16 for the first time publicly acknowledged that the state was considering calling Corey Caneiro to testify at the high-profile murder trial. However, the legal submission by the defense did not explain why Corey Caneiro ultimately never took the witness stand. Prosecutors are due to respond to the defense brief by April 6. Judge Lemieux said he will consider whether to dismiss that charge at a conference on 4/8/26.
3/30/26 Update: An appeal filed with the court, Caneiro has pointed to the judge & prosecution’s behavior as the reasons for why he should get a new trial. Judge Marc Lemieux’s frustration was visible beyond the stress ball mentioned during the trial, Caneiro’s attorney said. “Beginning on the first day of trial, the Court was often impatient, critical & hostile toward the defense, and only the defense,” Paul Caneiro’s attorney, Monika Mastellone, wrote. “During a variety of sidebars, the Court exhibited a clearly angry demeanor toward defense counsel, which was observable by the jury. Such demeanor included pointing at counsel, becoming flushed, scowling, squeezing a stress ball, and other angry gesticulations.” On the third day of the quadruple murder trial, Lemieux joked that he brought in a stress ball to the courtroom. “I picked the soft one,” Lemieux quipped. “I’m gonna see how I do with this, you guys can keep an eye on me, see how I’m doing with this.” But Mastellone said that stress ball became a problem because it was used repeatedly when they were cross-examining witnesses or speaking at a sidebar. “Because the Court told the jury to ‘keep an eye on’ his use of it, the jury was cognizant of the correlation between the stress ball & frustration with the defense.” Lemieux will hear arguments on the motion for a new trial at a hearing on 4/20/26. Caneiro faces life in prison when he is sentenced on 5/12/26.
 
  • #288
Not finding any articles on what happened yesterday. Anyone have better luck? TIA! :)

I have next motions hearing re new trial on 4/20/26.
 
  • #289
  • #290
Ah - never mind - found another article I can access!


April 11, 2026

FREEHOLD - Prosecutors have countered Paul Caneiro's claims he was denied a fair trial in the murders of four family members, arguing in a response filed April 6 that the verdict, delivered on Feb. 13 after three hours of deliberations in a seven-week trial, showed jurors were convinced no one else committed the crimes.

In a brief responding to Caneiro's motion for a new trial, Monmouth County Prosecutor Raymond S. Santiago, Deputy First Assistant Prosecutor Christopher Decker and Assistant Prosecutor Nicole Wallace denied Caneiro's allegations he was unfairly prejudiced by denigrating remarks and other statements made by prosecutors and Superior Court Judge Marc C. Lemieux during his trial.
[.....]
The chief defense argument that Lemieux denigrated and berated Caneiro's attorneys by being impatient, critical and hostile only toward them and not prosecutors is "without merit,” the prosecution's brief said. The prosecutors said the judge was attempting to try the case expeditiously, while the defense attorneys' lengthy cross-examination of witnesses was "riddled with” repetitive and irrelevant questions.
[.....]
Lemieux has scheduled a hearing on Caneiro's motion for a new trial for April 20.


a lot more in article
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
118
Guests online
1,964
Total visitors
2,082

Forum statistics

Threads
646,333
Messages
18,858,066
Members
245,986
Latest member
Coldcaserecovery
Top