ok, I can not fathom the idea that Ik 'stole" his own card. First, why make yourself known to the police? Every encounter I have had, they treat you as you are guilty, even if you are reporting something.
Second, he left that AM on vacation. so why would he report his own card stolen if he was going on vacation? How would he do it, from out of state? then not have any money for vacation?
I discredit that theory outright.
Next, as to why a card may have not been reported stolen to the bank. the fact that there is nothing in the account to steal in the first place. people are lazy. If there was $20,000 in there, then the person would certainly hurry up friday to cancel the card.
if there is $0 in it, or a tiny amount, even if the pin is on the card, then the motivation for someone to cancel it is near zero. especially for the type of people who have $0 to begin with.
Next, Person A could very well be JK. I beleive he had $0 in the account as well.
he "could" have been up, waiting for Sk to come home. He could have seen the robbery take place. it would be logical to assume that it was SK or a friend taking the card to get money for drugs. he, knowing there isn't any money in it anyways, doesn't report it stolen, because he believes it was Sk and he will confront her when he sees her.
Then, 2 days go by and he hasn't heard from her. He then calls her in as missing. Either at that time or later on, he says, "btw, someone broke into my vehicle and took my atm card." I didn't report it then because i thought it was SK who did it. Now I am concerened."
Still, there is $0 in the account... So, it gets padded with $5,000. (which earlier i add up the withdrawls and the balance and it is short $1 from $5,000).
They added the money to get the person to use it.
The timing of the "father is taking reward money" rumor is started, and so does the ATM use.(albeit, the reward is a different Cu then the bank card.)
person uses the card, undisguised in ANC twice, since no one knows who he is and he is leaving a day or two anyways.
Then uses it out of town. They keep track of its use. FBi puts out a "apb" on that card #...
texas pulls the guy over searches him and finds a card that he doesn't own. and with a name assocaited with a MP. Now, APD has a name and person. person matches the undisguised withdrawls in ANC.
APD then sends a unmarked car over to the area of the house to sit on it while a warrant is prepared. the next day the house is searched, the truck is found and searched, truck has blood, or evidence in it.
APD now has something to go on, asks to have him brought to ak, and seals the documents.
So, assumptions i make are. (also, the affadavit is NOT all inclusive, so one must assume they left out some of the most important facts, and only included some.....)
1. SK must have not come home before. That way it wouldn't be so wierd that she is not at work, and hasn't come home. JK is conditioned to this, and that is why he didn't report her missing at 10pm...
2. Ik kidnapped Sk for money, and to rob the coffee shop. She was broke. She had been beging her brother for $ for gas the day before. She doesn't have money, he says, get me money or i will kill you. SK knows her dads atm is or could be in the vehicle, and knows the pin. 9could also be duanes card, IDK). IK tries to use it that night, no money...( irecall somewhere else it has said the card was used that night.. that was either bad editing or a fact.)
3. APD beleived that she was still alive. Since, it may have been she has disappeared and gone on benders before, or not come home, they aren't sure she is dead or kidnapped etc. Then when the ATm gets used, they figure she is probably still around. giving the person the pin # to take out the money.
4. Once they get IK out of state, without SK, they are now not sure she is alive anymore.
5. "a" truck in the video is the same one released in pictures and found at IK house. One would assume that the video had a bad view, or a license plate or the ph # on the side was obscured, or they would know prior who owned it, and would have contacted the person prior. Or perhaps they did, and IK said he saw nothing. Either way, when they send a car to drive by, they see a truck that matches or could be the vehicle in the video, either the first time or again. But this time tying it to the person with the card, and the truck. by the time the video from the ANC withdrawls is obtained, IK is already gone. (i know that my card won't show a purchase until the next day), hence the reason he isn't apprehended on the first withdrawls. But now they know who he is, suspect him and issue the 'suspect" notification to other states, that is why his name popped up in Texas when they arrested him.
