Okay, knowing some of the information we know now, maybe it would be good to go back and look at the interview with actual APD and pick it apart.
http://community.adn.com/?q=adn/node/159690
Reporter asks: "a man walks up..can you talk a bit more about their interaction..."
"The problem that we have is that during the interaction and him coming inside, you can't see his face clearly...and..we've all understood that or else we'd certainly be releasing that.
But you can see, obviously, her reactions. And so, the rest of it pretty much is evidence, so we don't really want to discuss all of the things that go there, cuz some of that, the
players themselves would only be privy to."
My comment: Player(s)? Themselve(s)? Is Samantha a player? Or was there more than one perp?
How IS she reacting to this guy.
"It's obvious she was taken away against her will."
"What indication is there that this was someone she knew..."
"You know what, I don't think that anything we've released has been characterized as that..."
Pretty much everything else was annoying deflection of every question he asked, but please listen to it and see if there are anymore tidbits you can pick up. My attention span for CB's situation was short, I was more interested in how the police themselves describe the abduction video.
He ends with letting the police do their work, this "ain't a tv show" blah blah blah. But his closing line is "we need to let the police do their work and make the determination as to what happened and
who caused it to happen." Is that a weird way to speak about an abduction??? Or am I just reading too much into that?