AL AL - J.B. Beasley, 17, & Tracie Hawlett, 17, Ozark, 31 July 1999 #2

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thank you for the flow chart. You have obviously put a lot of time and thought into this case. I too feel that they key to the case is the location of the vehicle.

I believe it the killer acted alone and was unknown to the girls. He was probably not a resident of the area, but may have knowledge of it by doing business there or had family there.


Somehow he was able to get control of their car. I have wondered if maybe J.B. & Tracie got lost again or were not clear on the directions given to them at the convenience store where they stopped earlier. All of this is just MOO, but they may have stopped again at a different location (another store or perhaps a party they drove past?) that we are not aware of and asked for directions and the killer was there or at a minimum saw them there. Could he have been there and convinced them to give him a ride there as well? I don't really see them picking up a stranger, but perhaps he was able to some how convince them to give him a ride and he could guide them to the location of the party they were trying to reach?

I have always thought the motive was sex, a thrill-kill or both. According to LE, neither girl was raped in the traditional sense, but they may have been sodomized as evidenced by the DNA found on J.B.'s underclothes. LE made it know that only J.B. had it on her, but it could have been found on Tracie as well and LE chose not to publicize it?

Again, all of this is just my theory and there are certainly other possibilities.

So if he didn't know them... he HAD to see them at one of their stops... presumably the last stop. He would have had to over hear the directions and known where they where heading. Then wait for them and somehow stop them. Otherwise he got into the vehicle at the Little Big store. All this leads back to a local person. Like a broken record I sound... but I still think he lived/lives within one mile of the vehicle location.
 
I am very analytical. Sometimes I need to see things visually laid out. Although you can never rule out possibilities in an unsolved case, I feel the need for some of us to pick a direction and roll with it. Looking at the flow chart I just threw together... what is your input? What would you add? What would you delete as a viable path?
View attachment 57064

Maybe start with two initial possibilities such as known to killer(s)/unknown to killer(s) and work the known facts from there?
Or pick the "best" possible motive(s) and work from that point?

For example: if JB/TH were unknown to killer(s) was it a motive of opportunity?, then whom had the opportunity that night?

Could it have been a non local person, unknown, to JB AND TH, but had local help as in a local acquaintance/friend?

Did the Local PD have the accomplice and or killer but dropped the ball on legal rights violations or procedural processing thus negating the possibility of prosecution until some totally new evidence surfaces?

Quite a seemingly solvable case, yet terribly frustrating to see it not cleared.
 
So if he didn't know them... he HAD to see them at one of their stops... presumably the last stop. He would have had to over hear the directions and known where they where heading. Then wait for them and somehow stop them. Otherwise he got into the vehicle at the Little Big store. All this leads back to a local person. Like a broken record I sound... but I still think he lived/lives within one mile of the vehicle location.

BBM I was thinking that they probably stopped again after the Little Big Store and he either was able to convince them that he knew the location they were trying to find and offered to help them by riding along or was able to somehow commandeer their vehicle from that location. I think the location is not far from where the vehicle ended up with the girls in the trunk and he was able to walk back to his own vehicle or to the place he was spending the night. I believe that he had knowledge of the area, but didn't live there.

I'm going back and try to find the link, but the Chief of Police stated that they had several suspects since 1999 and they had cleared most of them. However, there was one out of state suspect that they interviewed several times that could not account for his time.

Here it is:
"The Man from Michigan: A man from Michigan who was at a party the night of the murders near where the car was found is also a "very viable" suspect, Chief Spivey said, even after tests failed to match the man's DNA to that found on J.B. Beasley’s clothing. The man, whom Spivey would not name, left town within days of the murders, the chief said, adding that investigators have traveled to Michigan three times to interview him. The man cannot account for three or four hours of his time on the night of the murders, and later made "suspicious" statements to people, Spivey said. He would not elaborate on what he meant by suspicious."
 
Don't forget that railroad tracks are right behind the BL store. Maybe someone on the train? (doesn't mean he was supposed to be on it)

This person might have been in their car when they got back in...
 
Only freight trains run through Ozark. I'm guessing only on weekdays as this is the same track running through my town. It only drops and picks up cars at a few local businesses, usually mid day. Mostly tanker and hopper cars. Not saying no one would be on it, just giving a bit of background on the trains.
 
Only freight trains run through Ozark. I'm guessing only on weekdays as this is the same track running through my town. It only drops and picks up cars at a few local businesses, usually mid day. Mostly tanker and hopper cars. Not saying no one would be on it, just giving a bit of background on the trains.

I figured they'd be freight trains. Thanks for the info about drops and pick ups. If it slows down people can jump off and on (like IRL, this is not an idea I got from Divergent). When I saw HE, I was surprised at how close the tracks are to BL.

But, I'm not married to that idea... this case is perplexing.
 
Could it be possible that the girls decided to run by someone's house on the way to the party? But not stop, just drive by. This might have made them turn off the road that would've been an easy ride to the party, but when they tried to cut back over to the right road, they got going the wrong way? Anyone who knows the area see any possibility in this?

I wouldn't discount the theory but think it's unlikely. I just dont think they could have missed 431, if they were lost after leaving the gas station in Headland, I believe 431 would be able to orient them. Here are a few screenshots of the area in Headland where they were on 431. If they turn right onto 99 or 134 they would have gone in the direction of the party in Haleburg. They ended up going left on 173 or 134.
.Capture.jpg Capture2.jpgCapture3.jpgCapture4.jpg
 
The "man from Michigan" is an Ozark-area resident who moved up there after the murders. He was named as a suspect by locals posting various places. The police haven't officially given out his name or declared him as a suspect. But, they have said enough to indicate it's probably the same guy.

Anyway, some locals were saying this guy and/or his associates were involved with meth.

This is discussed on the prior thread, I don't have any special knowledge about it or Mr. Michigan.

Someone found a post where someone quotes this guy saying he threw J.B.'s keys in the Ohio River. But, I think it is more likely the killer (whomever he is) either threw the keys away almost immediately or still has them.
 
In regards to the missing red cap, if the killer did take it do you think maybe he used it to maybe obscure his identity when walking home or back to his car just in case he did get spotted?
 
In regards to the missing red cap, if the killer did take it do you think maybe he used it to maybe obscure his identity when walking home or back to his car just in case he did get spotted?

That's a good idea.
 
Does anyone know if anything of substance came from the following? It would really be interesting to know if the 9mm casing matched the one found on Tracie's leg when she & J.B. were discovered inside the car. Also, did the soil match that on the girls' clothes?

"Since the day police discovered the bodies, they have said that J.B. and Tracie were shot while inside the Mazda's trunk. And, they've said, they believed the actual shooting happened somewhere other than where the car was found.

Yet, months into the investigation, police couldn't say where that somewhere else was.

Then, in March 2000, a woman who lived just south of town reported that she heard screams and what sounded like two gunshots on the night of the murders.

The woman didn't report the information sooner because she "didn't want to get involved," Chief Spivey said.

The area, next to what neighbors said is a now-vacant house, is surrounded by trees and has two World War II-era buildings on the property. The spider-web-encrusted buildings -- wooden structures that appear to be a barn and a half-collapsed garage -- sit about 100 feet off the roadway.

With FBI help, Spivey said, crime scene specialists and investigators combed the area and found a spent 9mm shell casing, the same caliber casing found in the trunk with the bodies.

Police sent the casing and a soil sample from the area to the state forensics lab, where they still sit. [July 2000]

Tipton said forensics experts will compare the dirt from that location with dirt found on J.B.'s and Tracie's clothing.

He said they will also examine the unique "extraction marks" left on the two casings by the gun that ejected them.

Because investigators are still awaiting those test results from the forensics lab, they don't know if the scene south of town is the actual murder scene."

The above was from an earlier post in the original thread.
 
Does anyone know if anything of substance came from the following? It would really be interesting to know if the 9mm casing matched the one found on Tracie's leg when she & J.B. were discovered inside the car. Also, did the soil match that on the girls' clothes?

"Since the day police discovered the bodies, they have said that J.B. and Tracie were shot while inside the Mazda's trunk. And, they've said, they believed the actual shooting happened somewhere other than where the car was found.

Yet, months into the investigation, police couldn't say where that somewhere else was.

Then, in March 2000, a woman who lived just south of town reported that she heard screams and what sounded like two gunshots on the night of the murders.

The woman didn't report the information sooner because she "didn't want to get involved," Chief Spivey said.

The area, next to what neighbors said is a now-vacant house, is surrounded by trees and has two World War II-era buildings on the property. The spider-web-encrusted buildings -- wooden structures that appear to be a barn and a half-collapsed garage -- sit about 100 feet off the roadway.

With FBI help, Spivey said, crime scene specialists and investigators combed the area and found a spent 9mm shell casing, the same caliber casing found in the trunk with the bodies.

Police sent the casing and a soil sample from the area to the state forensics lab, where they still sit. [July 2000]

Tipton said forensics experts will compare the dirt from that location with dirt found on J.B.'s and Tracie's clothing.

He said they will also examine the unique "extraction marks" left on the two casings by the gun that ejected them.

Because investigators are still awaiting those test results from the forensics lab, they don't know if the scene south of town is the actual murder scene."

The above was from an earlier post in the original thread.

In an earlier post I asked the same thing and someone responded that the results were NOT back. I'm guessing they have to be done with the results and it either did not match... they are inconclusive... or they are keeping it private.
 
Can someone with knowledge of that location post it on a map? The potential shooting location?
 
How did I miss that they were "shot in the face"??? For some reason I always assumed they were just shot in the head. Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't violence to the face typically a sign that they knew the person OR a sign of rage in general? For example, a hatred of women/girls? I may have to take a break from this and come back with a fresher point of view.
 
http://www.southeastsun.com/daleville/news/article_0cc8d965-fab7-567f-8858-80ec42772160.html

http://www.southeastsun.com/daleville/news/article_dcc7771b-8b25-5c91-bd66-ad4c36106581.html


Here's a couple of articles that talks about the cartridge found, they're from mar 2000 and speak of it as unspent. same caliber but different mfg and that there were no markings that would be helpful for comparison to other evidence. I don't know the date for the article above or whether it was spent or not but I tend to believe these earlier articles but who knows.

several pages back Gimpalong found what we think is the place on 123 south, at least it matched up with the only photo we've seen, so credit to him/her.

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?162847-AL-J-B-Beasley-17-amp-Tracie-Hawlett-17-murdered-in-Ozark-July-1999&p=10637833#post10637833

@easongt, I like the flow chart idea. I did something similar months back trying to come up with some reasonable scenarios based on two factors. Known to them or not and DNA related or not. That leaves four possibilities each with there own scenarios. I didn't get too far though and gave up on it.
 
I am going to try to take a break from this for a little while and come back with a fresh perspective. As of now... I still believe the following.

1. Someone crept into the vehicle at the Little Big. (I lean toward this)
2. He forced them at gunpoint to drive to an unknown location.
3. He attempted to assault them or performed some sort of sexual act with or without them.
4. He shot them in the trunk of the vehicle. I think it was dark wherever this took place with no lights nearby and he assumed all his casings landed on ground.
5. He drove the vehicle back to it's final spot because he lived or was parked near there.

Thanks for everyone's input and help.
 
How did I miss that they were "shot in the face"??? For some reason I always assumed they were just shot in the head. Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't violence to the face typically a sign that they knew the person OR a sign of rage in general? For example, a hatred of women/girls? I may have to take a break from this and come back with a fresher point of view.

Tracie was shot in the head, JB was shot in the cheek.

I believe both were forced to climb into the trunk at the same time and then he/they shot them, Tracie first then JB. It was said in one report I read years ago.. that one died instantly while the other took a little longer.
 
Cute, but no trains run from this area. I am from there and this is all a cover up. The Chief of Police in Ozark, his son committed suicide not long after this and left a note regarding the murders.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
60
Guests online
2,224
Total visitors
2,284

Forum statistics

Threads
601,162
Messages
18,119,791
Members
230,995
Latest member
MiaCarmela
Back
Top