I agree with that except for the fact we cannot account for Caylee from the time she left the nursing center on June 15th.
In a way we can, there is Great Grandma's sworn statement about the visit to her home after the nursing home.
We know what time they left her home after dinner.
Plus we have the neighbor's sworn statement about hearing yelling and cussing at the A home that night.
Anything KC said to her brother that he was not a witness to goes back to the origin which is KC and is automatically ruled out because it's a lie.
If he was a witness and can pass a LDT, I would believe it, but until then anything he repeats to anyone that ultimately has an origin in KC should be considered a lie.
And that includes everyone connected to her.
If they are repeating stories KC told them as fact, their statements should be considered lies.
Consider this too ... GA is 57. How many people do you know can remember details like he described after a month about the 16th?
He didn't know that he would never see Caylee again. Did he?
I live with a very bright, intelligent man who is 57 (some of you have met him He couldn't remember what he ate for dinner last week much less what his kids were wearing over a month ago.
That whole statement is suspect to me.
It sounds just like KC's crazy stories when she lies.
IMO