Allison Baden-Clay - GENERAL DISCUSSION THREAD #36

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.

SoSueMe

Former Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2009
Messages
8,119
Reaction score
42
Thank you for joining Websleuths! :welcome3:​


Please remember the following when discussing the Allison Baden-Clay case:
Websleuths is a moderated forum. We strive to discuss cases in a friendly environment.

Our rules can be reviewed here: The Rules (PLEASE make sure you know the rules!)


Gerard Bayden-Clay has been arrested and charged with the murder of Allison Bayden-Clay


Thread 1

Thread 2
Thread 3
Thread 4

Thread 5

Thread 6

Thread 7

Thread 8

Thread 9

Thread 10

Thread 11

Thread 12

Thread 13

Thread 14
Thread 15

Thread 16

Thread 17

Thread 18

Thread 19

Thread 20

Thread 21
Thread 22

Thread 23

Thread 24

Thread 25

Thread 26

Thread 27

Thread 28

Thread 29

Thread 30

Thread 31
Thread 32

Thread 33

Thread 34


REMEMBER: No cutting and pasting of comments from other social or media websites. You may paraphrase and provide a link.

The only social media sites allowed are those belonging to the victim, Gerard Baden-Clay and any named (by law enforcement) POI or Suspect, or site created and devoted to the murder of Allison.


Media/Timeline Reference Thread: CLICK HERE



CHAT ROOM: not for case discussion!
 
119498958977780800stop_sign_right_font_mig_.svg.med.png


Have you read the previous post? If not, read it now.
By posting on this thread, you are stating you know the rules!


stay-on-topic.gif
stay-on-topic.gif
stay-on-topic.gif

http://www.beatlesbible.com/wp/wp-content/forum-smileys/stay-on-topic.gif
 
A list of our verified posters can be found here...

Verified Professional Posters
If your not on our list and would like to be verified please contact Admin at the address below, its all confidential.
If you do not wish to be identified as an expert in a certain area, we ask that you refrain from answering questions that are specifically directed to those that have been verified as specialist in their area and that you do not claim to be a professional in any area.
If a member posts with "expertise" please check to make sure they are on this list. If not, please do not take their post as professional information, but rather just as another opinion ;much as you would with any member of the general posting membership.

If a member wants to post as a professional ( a lawyer, shrink, and so on) or as an insider who knows the people involved then they must email us at the following email.
wsverify@xmission.com
Please include:
The case
Their Websleuths name
Their phone number and a good time to call
Their real name.
In the subject line please put which case they are asking to be verified on.

All info will be kept strictly confidential
Thank you!

ANYONE who posts facts and IS NOT a verified professional MUST POST A LINK TO VERIFY THE INFORMATION!

Any post without this procedure will result in the post being removed without explanation and repeated violations could result in a loss of posting privileges.
 
We have a detailed, formal Terms of Service (TOS) posted separately, and that TOS is what you will be held to as a member here. It's long and detailed because it has to be in the world we live in, and you are expected to read it, understand it and abide by it. However, we can sum it up as follows:

1) Be a decent human being;
2) Treat your fellow posters as the decent human beings they are;
3) Keep in mind that whatever you post will likely live on forever, so think before you press "Submit Reply".
4) It's a big world. People will disagree with you. You will disagree with them. This can be done with respect, and that's what we expect.
progress.gif

Please continue here...
 
Please do not discuss rumors. Although SOME rumors turn out to be true in the end, there are also those that are just that 'rumor,' and tend to derail the threads. Until there's a 'link' to verify a circumstance, we ask you do NOT post rumors.

This includes discussion of what the minor children "might" have said.

If locals wish to be verified (as local residents with insider information), then we would be able to discuss, unless the information might jeopardize the investigation or case.
 
Okay guys. Back to Allison's case or head over to the chit chat thread. :cheers:
 
Ok just caught up on what Kimster was saying - off topic stuff.

Ok...now to Nads & Mani who asked before what I thought about Little Ugly Creek and Allison being placed in water when she apparently hated it.

1. The idea Allison was placed in or around Little Ugly Creek because she was "beautiful" is just a romantic notion I feel. I don't believe GBC would have given that line of thinking a second thought and feel it wouldn't have even occurred to him to make any such connection. He was more interested in other things. I personally think its name says it all. It is a little, ugly creek IMO. I've been there.

2. As for the water, Allison hating it and putting her there as a final punishment. Nah. I'm still going with she was put there as it was close to the Brisbane river and decomposition was thought to be speedier I'd say and cause of death harder to detect. Burying in national park is futile I feel for GBC. He needed a body to be found - eventually. If he buried her it's riskier I feel all around.
 
Ok just caught up on what Kimster was saying - off topic stuff.

Ok...now to Nads & Mani who asked before what I thought about Little Ugly Creek and Allison being placed in water when she apparently hated it.

1. The idea Allison was placed in or around Little Ugly Creek because she was "beautiful" is just a romantic notion I feel. I don't believe GBC would have given that line of thinking a second thought and feel it wouldn't have even occurred to him to make any such connection. He was more interested in other things. I personally think its name says it all. It is a little, ugly creek IMO. I've been there.

2. As for the water, Allison hating it and putting her there as a final punishment. Nah. I'm still going with she was put there as it was close to the Brisbane river and decomposition was thought to be speedier I'd say and cause of death harder to detect. Burying in national park is futile I feel for GBC. He needed a body to be found - eventually. If he buried her it's riskier I feel all around.


Sanity resumes.

Great post and agree wholeheartedly with both points.

GBC has shown nothing to meet the notions that he displayed some thought processes around the resting place.

He's just a simple muppet
 
Interesting the friend who visited with the BCs...google him when you get time. I wonder if he's one of the people GBC had a gentlemans handshake deal with?! He's an accountant. Somehow I knew that before I googled him but had to convince myself. Pure speculation of course but people like GBC often have friends who are in the financial industry...convenient:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
76
Guests online
158
Total visitors
234

Forum statistics

Threads
608,561
Messages
18,241,340
Members
234,401
Latest member
CRIM1959
Back
Top