What is the context for the mention of the film? Is Crini perhaps demonstrating various scenarios, such that even if there is substance to the Naruto film, it does not preclude the participation of Knox and Sollecito in the murder?
My understanding from your above comment was that Crini absolutely stated that the film was watched and that the pair left the apartment at 9:30. At the same time, from what little I know of the proseuction statements, it seems to me that the comments are more a response to props that the defense has offered in defense. That is, the prosecution looks at the various scenarios and follows them through to a conclusion, in this case, I suspect that the conclusion is that even if they watched the film, they could still be involved in the murder.
I do see a lot of "let's suppose", or "let's say" from the prosecutor.
My understanding from your above comment was that Crini absolutely stated that the film was watched and that the pair left the apartment at 9:30. At the same time, from what little I know of the proseuction statements, it seems to me that the comments are more a response to props that the defense has offered in defense. That is, the prosecution looks at the various scenarios and follows them through to a conclusion, in this case, I suspect that the conclusion is that even if they watched the film, they could still be involved in the murder.
I do see a lot of "let's suppose", or "let's say" from the prosecutor.