~n/t~
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2011
- Messages
- 17,670
- Reaction score
- 74
:seeya:
BBM: I have to respectfully disagree with this:
- The Court is very well aware that this is a "high profile case" ...
- The Court is very well aware that the Knox-Mellases hired a PR Firm to "spin" the "Amanda is innocent" story in the U.S.
- The Court is very familiar with Knox's book, and that she received a huge payment [in her own words] for this book ...
- The Court is very familiar with Knox's book, which contradicts the evidence and which also contradicts points contained in Sollecito's book ...
The Court in Florence knows what is really going on, and it is an "insult to their intelligence" to use the argument that she cannot afford to travel, yada yada yada ...
:twocents:
They shouldn't even consider any of that. The focus should be on the evidence. Yah it was nice Sollecito showed up , I suppose, but do you think his presence shifted their decision one way or the other? I doubt it.
BTW I'm pro confused just like OldSteve. I thought they were guilty in the first trial but now I keep shifting back and forth:fence: