geevee
Well-Known Stickie
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2013
- Messages
- 17,616
- Reaction score
- 16,549
I replied to you earlier that the prosecutors say the knife matches one of the neck wounds and also that the wounds coming from both the left and the right.
Personally I don't need the knife to the assume guilt. IMO the evidence as a whole points to guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Singling out the evidence and explaining it away is why Hellmann was annulled.
Frankly I'm beginning to see 'the evidence as a whole' as proof that AK lived in that cottage and her boyfriend's dna was found in small amounts as you'd expect a visitor's would, RG's dna was everywhere the murder occurred but AK's and RS's was only found in small enough amounts as to be explained as them having been there. Everything beyond that, so far as I've seen (and I do fully admit I have not pored over every bit of evidence but looking at what I have seen as a whole) are many inferences drawn and conclusions reached that do not speak to the evidence as a whole but merely are used to show she and RS could have been involved.
I fully agree her statements have not given her a look of innocence and have worked against her, but so far, I have not seen a weapon placed in her hand, or her boyfriend's, but it is indisputable (to me) that it was in RG's hand.
I am still on the fence though, I hope this trial will answer lingering questions but I sorta doubt it.