curioser
Member
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2013
- Messages
- 214
- Reaction score
- 5
I'm a bit rusty on the facts of the case, but it sounds like the "other client" has knowledge of activities that are prohibited to Hadsell, which I would guess is possession of guns.
It doesn't necessarily mean the "other client" has any info on AJ.
Am I thinking right?
That's what it sounds like to me.