arkansasmimi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2014
- Messages
- 10,161
- Reaction score
- 114
Many examples, but the first one that popped into my head was how he referred to AJ --- always with "my"
bbm, Honestly, others have also
Many examples, but the first one that popped into my head was how he referred to AJ --- always with "my"
Anjelica "AJ" Hadsell was last seen about 5:30 a.m. at her parent's home in the Tarrallton area of Norfolk, according to a police news release. She was reported missing about 9:15 p.m.
http://hamptonroads.com/2015/03/norfolk-police-18yearold-missing-tuesday
Might be the closest we have to the truth at this point.
As a little experiment, I set my husband up to see if he noticed things that are in his normal day to day life. Simple thing, like our dog that meets him at the driveway everyday like clockwork. Only this day, I had the dog in the house so he couldn't meet my husband. This particular dog NEVER barks inside, and thus was sound asleep in the guest bedroom. I asked husbster how our dog was feeling today. (Dog had a broken leg years ago, and is having some arthritis in it lately if he runs too much, he starts limping.) Hubster stated the dog was doing great today, and he didn't notice a limp at all.... of course he didn't see a limp...he never saw the dog!!!! My husband didn't intend to lie to me about the dog. He cares a lot of this dog. YET, in his mind, he saw the dog as he would on a normal day, even though it was impossible for him to have seen the dog.
JMO...
To bring this back on topic -- and forgive me for venturing away -- we should circle this back to WH's statements regarding his incentive to violate the law by breaking and entering. I agree that I perceived WH's arguments as disingenuous, if not downright disturbing. Though the vast majority of us would swear we'd stop at no ends to find the truth about a missing loved one, in reality, most rational individuals observe legal boundaries. So at the very least, imo, we can conclude that WH's actions were rash, and potentially could prove harmful to a prosecution. The question in my mind is whether or not that was intentional.
What, if anything, does WH know of the truth? Or, did he bring undue attention to himself by his irrational, albeit possibly innocent (wrt AJ's disappearance), actions?
Cops rarely get a tip to the actual location of a body.
I wonder who called it in?
Much oblige.
Just jumping off your post, Bessie. So possibly some things to think about along this line would be:
1) Did WH break into the house with the intent to plant evidence?
2) Did WH break into the house with the hopes of finding evidence?
3) Did WH break into the house to tamper with evidence?
4) What types of thoughts/ideas would WH have to convince himself that this person may have been involved in AJ's disappearance? (other than so-called *creepy texts*?)
5) Or was WH's intent of the breaking and entering to attempt to frame someone for AJ's disappearance? And possibly to take the focus off of himself?
6) How many people were aware of this plan (if it was a planned decision) to break into the house?
SRBMDexter, there were conflicting news reports that day IIRC, but one of them said that NPD said their going to the house in Franklin was not a tip, but that their investigation led them there. I will try to see if I can find a link.
I find several things disturbing about the break in, not the least of which was the punching of the dog, but one thing that really stands out to me is the fact that, when interviewed, WH went to great lengths to describe AJ's Longwood jacket. Not once does he mention any other article of clothing she was wearing at this alleged gas station meeting. The Longwood jacket with AJ's name on it. We see the very same thing with the cut up credit card left on the street...it was cut in such a way that her entire name was visible. Let's assume, for the moment, that Texty was responsible for cutting up AJ's debit card and tossing it on the street. Why would he do that? If you had murdered someone, would YOU cut up your victim's credit card and toss it on the street you lived on, taking extra care to leave a piece with the entire name of your victim on it? Why wouldn't you burn it, destroy it, toss it as far from your home as you possibly could? Let's, for a moment, assume Texty was responsible for AJ's murder, and let's assume that he took her jacket, rolled it up and stashed it in the cushion of his couch. Why would he do that? Would you hold on to evidence that tied you to a murder victim? Or would you burn it, shred it, toss it as far from your home as you possibly could?
In my mind, whoever was responsible for cutting and discarding the credit card was the very same person who had possession of AJ's jacket. Both of these objects clearly had AJ's name on them. Whoever did this obviously wanted these two items to be immediately identified as AJ's. And that person, whoever it was, went to great lengths to make sure these items were "discovered", and tied to Texty, imo.
Who knew Texty and disliked him long before AJ disappeared? Who lead the search, and directed everyone where to look the day the cut up debit card was found? Who broke into Texty's house and "found" AJ's jacket? Who was it that, when LE didn't mention this jacket, came right out and asked them if they verified the jacket as AJ's. The answer to all those questions is Wesley Hadsell.
JMO
...lengths to describe AJ's Longwood jacket. Not once does he mention any other article of clothing she was wearing at this alleged gas station meeting. The Longwood jacket with AJ's name on it. We see the very same thing with the cut up credit card left on the street...it was cut in such a way that her entire name was visible.
...Both of these objects clearly had AJ's name on them. Whoever did this obviously wanted these two items to be immediately identified as AJ's. And that person, whoever it was, went to great lengths to make sure these items were "discovered", and tied to Texty, imo.
YES! THIS^^^ Probably because they were able to get WH phone records for personal AND work once he was arrested.Dexter, there were conflicting news reports that day IIRC, but one of them said that NPD said their going to the house in Franklin was not a tip, but that their investigation led them there. I will try to see if I can find a link.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No, it's off limits in this forum. There is no evidence the owners knew anyone involved, and the house had been abandoned for some time.Dexter, there were conflicting news reports that day IIRC, but one of them said that NPD said their going to the house in Franklin was not a tip, but that their investigation led them there. I will try to see if I can find a link.
Can someone repost who owned this house? I can,t find it.
p.s. when are the toxicology reports due?
IMO, I believe they already have the info and are awaiting a grand jury indictment.RSBM
About nine weeks from April 10....likely around June 12, but it could take longer.
RSBM- AJ's jacket with her name, AJ's credit card with name intact, also wanted to add the Norview High School shorts discovered in Chesapeake, clearly left as another identifiable piece of AJ's clothing/ property. I'm sure it seemed very clever to whomever dropped the breadcrumbs at the time, now it just reeks of obvious manipulation of evidence, imo.