nancy botwin
Verified Expert
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2008
- Messages
- 1,401
- Reaction score
- 0
I've been looking through the mountain of computer forensic data released last September and uploaded yesterday to a file sharing site by dedicated websleuther Muzikman. :rocker:
I posted yesterday on the escort service surfing activity, and I will have more to say about that in a future post. Suffice it to say, I am 99% certain George is solely responsible for the visits to escort sites, :blushing: and KC is uninvolved in that surfing activity.
This evening I took a close look at the visits to missing person's websites widely reported last September in the media. My conclusion is that KC did not visit missing persons websites prior to Caylee's disappearance. In fact, I do not believe she is responsible for those visits at all.
Following is the raw data for the visits in question:
07/16/2008 14:51:37 06/24/2008 16:01:46 http://www.missingkids.com/photographs/NCMC1097725c1t.jpg
07/16/2008 14:51:31 07/03/2008 01:28:12 http://www.missingkids.com/photographs/NCMC1099693c1t.jpg
07/16/2008 14:51:25 07/10/2008 11:37:33 http://www.missingkids.com/photographs/NCMC1096469c1t.jpg
07/16/2008 14:51:24 05/27/2008 12:58:47 http://www.missingkids.com/photographs/NCMC1096536c1t.jpg
07/16/2008 14:51:24 04/24/2008 16:06:48 http://www.missingkids.com/photographs/NCMC1094062c2t.jpg
07/16/2008 14:51:24 04/24/2008 16:06:48 http://www.missingkids.com/photographs/NCMC1094062c1t.jpg
07/16/2008 14:51:24 05/03/2008 17:07:29 http://www.missingkids.com/photographs/NCMC1094659c1t.jpg
07/16/2008 14:51:24 06/23/2008 15:30:12 http://www.missingkids.com/photographs/NCMC1098504c1t.jpg
07/16/2008 14:51:24 04/24/2008 16:06:48 http://www.missingkids.com/photographs/NCMC1094062c3t.jpg
07/16/2008 14:51:24 06/24/2008 14:14:01 http://www.missingkids.com/photographs/NCMC1098088c1t.jpg
07/16/2008 14:51:24 07/02/2008 19:50:00 http://www.missingkids.com/photographs/NCMC1099149c1t.jpg
07/16/2008 14:51:24 07/01/2008 00:06:13 http://www.missingkids.com/photographs/NCMC1099410c1t.jpg
07/16/2008 14:51:24 03/17/2008 15:47:48 http://www.missingkids.com/photographs/NCMC1091268c1t.jpg
07/16/2008 14:51:24 04/10/2007 12:29:03 http://www.get-involved.com/mashup/marker.swf
07/16/2008 14:51:22 http://www.get-involved.com/mashup/RSS_Read.php?state=XX
07/16/2008 14:51:22 http://www.get-involved.com/mashup/RSS_Read.php?state=XX
07/16/2008 14:51:21 06/19/2007 06:32:24 http://www.get-involved.com/mashup/map_small.swf
07/16/2008 14:51:20 04/26/2007 08:04:49 http://www.get-involved.com/mashup/images/kids_widget_04.gif
07/16/2008 14:51:20 04/26/2007 08:04:48 http://www.get-involved.com/mashup/images/kids_widget_01.gif
07/16/2008 14:51:20 04/26/2007 08:04:49 http://www.get-involved.com/mashup/images/kids_widget_05.gif
07/16/2008 14:51:20 04/26/2007 08:04:49 http://www.get-involved.com/mashup/images/kids_widget_02.gif
07/16/2008 14:43:09 http://www.get-involved.com/mashup/RSS_Read.php?state=XX
There are a few things to note about each item listed. First, the items are objects on the website, such as an image (.gif or .jpg) or shockwave video (.swf). The web browser will store the objects on the computer so that the next time the website is visited, it will appear to load faster than the first time. This is called caching.
The date / time shown in red indicates when the object was accessed by the web browser. This is indicative of when the website was surfed.
The other date / time (if there is one) indicates when the object was last modified by whoever created it or otherwise owned the object. Using an image, for example, this date / time could indicate when the picture was taken, resized, photoshopped...you name it. It is often indicative of when the web page was created or modified. It is not indicative of when the web page was surfed.
Unfortunately, the media saw the old dates and assumed that they were surf dates. LE did not make that assumption. There is nothing in the complete forensic report that indicates they ever thought this was something to look into.
I should further point out that the sites were visited from the laptop computer and not the home computer.
So what really happened? :waitasec:
Recall that Lee picked up KC's computer on the evening of the 15th from Tony's. (I will need to post later on the activity beginning late that night, but in an attempt to keep this post to under five pages, I will stay on topic. )
Sometime during the afternoon of the 16th the "cayleeismissing" myspace page goes live. This page becomes a missing person's website - Caylee's. Work on this page occurred between 2:37 PM and 2:52 PM on July 16th - completely encompassing the time the missing person's sites were accessed.
Given KC was pre-occupied during this time, the best candidate for this activity is ... Lee. He was just trying to get Caylee's name out there as a missing person. :angel:
wow! This is very interesting! Excellent work--
JB would do well to set http://www.websleuths.com/forums/search.php?searchid=1889621 as his homepage :wink: