benjaminfpierce
New Member
- Joined
- May 13, 2011
- Messages
- 67
- Reaction score
- 0
I'm confused why anyone would think the julian date would have anything to do with this. Bradley did not say the chloroform site was searched 84 times in one day. Bradley was testifying about the deleted dates on the owner account using Firefox which is why cash backe was needed to recover the data. CA probably doesn't know how to delete history. Bradley said "how to make chloroform" was searched, bookmarked then visited 84 times over several days not one date. Then those specific dates were deleted.
I agree, also Bradley said that the sci-spot page was accessed without a REFERER.
But my issue is that the other report showed Myspace being hit ±80 times. So maybe he wrote his Mork parser incorrectly? Maybe his index was off by 1? Maybe his loop was zero based and he used an index off by 1?
His report could be wrong about it being Sci-Spot or Myspace if they were right next to each other sequentially.