19; jm changed to a no after reading the arguments presented in the thread. Since photos are not going to be released, I don't understand how the clinical examination of the sparse remains is disrespectful. I've asked a few times but so far haven't gotten a response. Will you explain how the written report is disrespectful to Caylee? TIA
Each one of us has our own personal take on such things. I'm speaking from where I view the subject. The LAST thing I want to think about is an autopsy and the details of how Caylee's remains were found. However, I've met friends on WS that are in the medical field who have a more professional interest in remains.
If we were all in a room together and someone was reading the autopsy results out loud, I'd be the one doubling over. I can't hardly handle putting "remains" and "Caylee" together. Although GA was totally RUDE in his depo when he was upset about the attorneys discussing Caylee's remains, I did understand how uncomfortable it was to hear the words.
Hope I typed that so you could understand where I'm coming from...I have a hard time explaining this tactfully. :silenced: