Well perhaps you could explain your post stating that my opinions (not questions) are old hat for the rest of you!
Gladly. You said, quote:
Historically, when children are murdered by a parent, thinking logically, they would have gotten rid of the body, especially if they were going to stage a kidnapping.
I can't imagine parents murdering their child, place them in a wine cellar and then call 911 knowing the police were going to find her.
I know JR found her, but it could have just as easily been LE.
Does not make sense -- just MOT & O's.
What I mean is that this is an issue that often comes up around here, and a lot of us have addressed it many times. That's all.
My perception of your post is that my post is insignificant, not worthy of rehashing and IMO the comment was very condescending.
I'm sorry if I left you with that impression. I'm just really burnt-out. Moreover, it's not that it isn't worth discussing. It's just that going over all those old posts gives me a headache!
My point/meaning regarding the Boulder PD having the case given back to their jurisdiction is ...
Boulder PD have stated they will start from the very beginning -- every single detail investigated/rehashed -- nothing will be considered insignificant. All the dots just may get connected this time!!!
That's fine with me. (Frankly, I'm PLEASED that they got it back, for just those reasons.) It's just my opinion that the dots were connected a long time ago. Like I said: MY OPINION.
I can't imagine one of the detectives stating -- oh that's old hat -- next!!!!!
Yeah, I know. We got plenty of that over the last few years!