The thing is - the State has rested. They did not prove the phone call was spoofed.
The defense is not finished yet and are already showing signs of tampering. Will they prove it? I think they will. Time will tell.
But not being able to prove the call was spoofed greatly weakens the state's case. Everyone knows that.
Here we will just disagree. The prosecution has shown the various ways the call could be made and thus have cast doubt on the alibi of BC. This will certainly be addressed in closing arguments.
The 6:05am call, 1 second seizure time that was used to located the phone. Kind of hard to locate a phone that does not ring. The duration of the call was 23 seconds. Isn't this the same length of time as a csim start simulated call.
The multiple calls to both cell pone voicemail and work voicemail. Under the pretense of the working issues related to Ireland upgrade these work calls have been shown to be not the case.
The second trip to HT on 7/12 to get laundry detergent when according to the deposition BC started the laundry that morning. So why, on the first trip to get milk would he not have gotten laundry detergent as well.
Others have mentioned many other odd occurrences of 7/11-7/12
1. cleaned trunk of car
2. missing the right or left shoes from 2 different pairs
3. BC's shoes on HT trip not being located
4. missing sticks and ducks from foyer
5. BC sleeping on the crack of 2 single beds pushed together
6. Not remembering what dress but remembering it had thin straps
7. Spending all morning cleaning the floors when it was obvious the house was very messy in other rooms.
8. Both parents up at 4am and both stayed up throughout the morning.
9. BC supports production systems in an enterprise and therefore there is no need for FXO port testing. Leads one to believe that this FXO port was used at the house for some period of time. He was not in the TAC and thus needed to type of voice interface to recreate a customer issue.
10. All of NC's possession's were found in the house, her car keys, cell phone and her necklace.
So you can talk about the straw, the possible tampering of evidence by the CPD and the fact that if a husband murdered his wife he would have enough respect to fully clothe her. <mod snip>
<mod snip>