bloghooligan
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2011
- Messages
- 183
- Reaction score
- 0
It's not that he kept it for the money. It's that it came off during her murder. I don't know how it came off but it was on when she was at the party, she wore it to sleep, she wore it to run and it was not on her when her body was found but it was found in their house. The photo enhanced by otto shows the pendant that the defense claimed is not there. If the prosecution doesn't have somebody local to enhance it for them, they should hire otto.
I disagree with respect to what Otto's photo shows. The prosecution has had that HT video for months do you believe for one moment that they haven't had an expert look at that video? Also, that necklace wouldn't have just 'come off' during the struggle/strangle/murder. If anything it would have broken and there is no evidence of that. If the necklace had broken during the struggle BC would not have boxed it up and kept it. moo
eta - sorry, typo removed the word "not" from between the bolded text