Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hi everyone, I'm new here so please correct me if I am doing something wrong or posting on the wrong place. I came across this John Doe case and it's really stuck with me since I read about it. Here is a link to the case- https://identifyus.org/en/cases/2843
The remains were found entangled in tree about the Poteau River in Fort Smith, Arkansas. However, the Poteau only runs very briefly in Arkansas, and is mostly in Oklahoma. He was found November 2001, remains are described as "mummified" yet they've posted no range of years that he could have been missing. If a body is mummified isn't it possible it could have been there longer than 11 months? Curiously, his hands and left foot are missing. What has really peaked my interest is the contents of his pockets-
" A hotel key with orange tag that reads (A04), 1 small quartz wristwatch, a key ring with 2 attached keys, 1 yelow metal wedding band, 1 straw, 1 pocket knife, 1 nail clipper, 1 cigarette lighter, 21 quarters, 3 dimes, 2 nickels, 2 pennies, and 1 $1 bill."
The fact that he has a wedding band of course is says he's married, but he also has a tattoo that reads "Teresa" with a heart under with a band through that that says "one love" and what appears to be initials on the heart- J.C. T.C. It seems possible that T.C. is Teresa C. and his initials are J.C. The pocket full of quarters paired with the hotel key suggests laundry. But he also has a knife in his pocket (didn't try to defend himself if it was a homicide). The nail clippers would seem to rule out that he was adventuring on the river, though his clothes would have been suitable for such an activity, and the straw seems to rule out adventuring too. Robbery doesn't seem to be a motive as he still has his wedding ring and watch.
--body moved from somewhere else?(mummified)--It more than likely was stored somewhere dry-- like you said no sign of struggle--some body parts missing--possibly removed to prevent identification(he might have had scars or more tattoos)--also robbery doesnt appear to be a motive -might have known his attacker--the hotel key looks like a key from an older hotel?--or a old hotel key(most hotels have switched to the electronic card system)--It has a letter and number--possible storage locker key?
Quarters in pocket---was he on his way to or from his hotel room(to go to a vending machine or get food?)--also possible hotel key was found in his shorts pocket-seems he was just leaving the room for a short time/planned to return. -I would check missing persons who have tattoos/scars on hands and left foot in addition to the heart tattoo--
I agree, he was probably staying in the hotel at the time. This would have been the best way to follow through IMO. I'm sure most hotels would have a record and would remember if someone disappeared and took their keys with them.
That he was gone for a short period of time could explain why he took the keys. Or maybe he was planning on being out until late so the hotel staff let him keep his keys if there was not going to be anyone on duty.
I don't think he just went for a swim if he was wearing his jeans and had a shoe on him. Most likely if he wasn't moved to that location he was probably hiking in the woods. Maybe the fact that the river flowed very briefly through that region was a point of interest.
All IMO of course.