AR - Rep. Harris rehomed his adopted daughter to man who sexually abused her

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
this was the harris' statement from yesterday, i do not know if they have given their press conference yet today;

"Rep. and Mrs. Harris have suffered a severe injustice. Due to threats of possible abandonment charges, they were unable to reach out to DHS for help with
children who presented a serious risk of harm to other children in their home. Upon the advice of both a psychiatrist and a pediatrician, they were forced to
move the children to the home of trusted friends, who had a lot of experience with children with reactive attachment disorder. Rep. and Mrs. Harris are
devastated about the outcome of that decision, but faced with no good option, they did the best that they knew how."
 
all of the above should be verifiable from other sources;

who threatened them with possible abandonment charges?
what psychiatrist and doctor advised them?
what evidence of reattachment disorder and threats to other children is there?

and even if all of the above is true, it still seems like a terrible solution to this is for people to just place their adopted children in another home of their choosing with no oversight from the state,
i cant imagine people would really think that this should be an appropriate way of handling this.

but i would imagine "oversight from the state" is going to end up being the critical issue here, unforunately. i will try to keep an open mind for now.
 
http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlo...r-to-eventual-rehoming-of-two-younger-sisters

The Arkansas Times has learned that Rep. Justin Harris and his wife Marsha adopted a third girl in addition to the two children who were the focus of this week's cover story about rehoming — an older sister.

We've been told she was about 8 years old upon entering the Harris home in 2012 along with her younger siblings. Unlike the two girls in our previous story, she evidently left the Harris household long before the adoption was finalized.

Prior to our publishing the story, unofficial sources had mentioned the third girl to the Times but we were unable to substantiate the presence of the third girl in the household. Since the story broke, we've been contacted by multiple sources in Northwest Arkansas, some with knowledge of the adoption, who confirm that the Harrises did intend to permanently adopt the third sister as well.
 
for what reason was the 3rd sister not also adopted?
where did she go once she left the harris' house? back to state care?

seems like you would expect a 5/6 year old girl to struggle even more in this situation once you add in the fact that her big sister is now gone.
what a sad situation all around.
 
Ummm--there was no DHS involvement when the kids were placed with the pedophile (who is now in prison). In states that have moved to enact laws against rehoming, they require the involvement/approval of authorities (a judge, DHS) prior to a parent making any such placement.

Ummm, according to Harris, the pedophile was vetted.

Harris said he was devastated and sickened by news of the arrest, which occurred April 4, more than two months after Francis had left employment at the school. Harris said Francis had worked previously in early childhood education for the Bentonville School District and with a Head Start program, plus he had been through intensive state scrutiny in the course of adopting children. He also was a youth pastor at a church. "He came with a pristine record," he said.

http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2014/04/21/former-pre-school-teacher-charged-with-rape
 
for what reason was the 3rd sister not also adopted?
where did she go once she left the harris' house? back to state care?

seems like you would expect a 5/6 year old girl to struggle even more in this situation once you add in the fact that her big sister is now gone.
what a sad situation all around.

It is an outrageous situation. The guy is pulling in ton of taxpayer money both in adoption subsidies and funding for his school. Time to do both an audit and a follow-up on all other placements to see if those parents have given away children.

JMO
 
Wow, I had no idea it was that easy to remove an adopted child from your home. Who knows what the Harris family went through before they gave these girls away? Someone should know. Hopefully that someone will speak up, because the Harris' are looking really bad here.
 
Naturally, people are calling for his resignation. There are apparently subsidies in play, subsidies that Harris is claiming he transferred to Francis. I dont know where to start and where to begin....the story starts with three little girls, aged 8, 6 and 3 who were brought into the home of the Harris' in September 2013. The two older girls had been sexually abused hence their removal from bio home. Almost instantly, the 8 year old was bounced out, returned to DHS care and is now successfully living with a loving family and apparently thriving.

If that isnt stomach turning enough, the treatment of the younger two has been well documented.

I dont have the appetite for this...these babies were failed in every way possible. Harris better start constructing their trust funds...that may be the only way for him to make any kind of ammends whatsoever. And never be permitted to adopt again.
 
To respond to your bolded while I don't believe in blaming small children I do think there are situations that arise where parents can't possibly continue to keep all children in the home safe if all children are to remain in the home. I'm not saying that was the situation in the Harris family (and given the ages of the children I find it less likely but I have personally seen scenarios where older children were abused by younger children so it is not impossible). As far as going through DHS, I completely agree that is what they should do and from what has come out in the media about this story I think that was what they initially tried to do but it sounds like DHS was not willing to take these children back and threatened them with abandonment charges if they pursued the issue. This could have led to them having their other children removed from the home. I can understand how they have felt like they were in between a rock and hard place.

To answer your questions, based on another poster's timeline, it appears that the girls were in the home for approximately six months before finalization and then another six or seven months after finalization before the rehoming. Altogether they seem to have been in the home from September 2012 through October 2013.

To just share a perspective. We have friends who adopted a child through foster care. She and her husband (who are both pediatricians) really devoted their life to this child. They read books on adoption, attachment, etc before even beginning the journey. Once the child was in the home they pursued various therapies and they kept this child's world small (the joys of practicing together they viewed that although they might not always see each other at least one could be available to their own child and one to the children of their practice with medical emergencies). This child who came into their home at age three was with one of them (no daycare) until she started kindergarten. They struggled with this child from the beginning and really struggled after the adoption was finalized when she was four (maybe it was the age, maybe the honeymoon was over both theories have some support). Over the years there were multiple visits to pediatric sub specialists, child psychiatrists, attempts at medication, etc but things continued to deteriorate. By the time she was six the wife tearfully admitted that they had decided not to have more because they were afraid of what their daughter might do to a younger sibling. She was their daughter and they loved her even if she wasn't in a place to love them and they felt that they had made a commitment to her. They had already rehomed all family pets by this time. When this child was nine the wife did conceive and although she couldn't fathom abortion she strongly considered placing her unborn child for adoption because she believed that might really be the best option. Their younger daughter was delivered at 34 weeks after the wife was physically assaulted by her then 10 year old daughter. The police and child protective were involved but once they were satisfied that the perpetrator really was the ten year old they wanted to consider it all a parenting issue. The DA refused to pursue assault charges against a 10 year old (which I truly believe that the mom only filed as a hail mary pass at help for her child or at least some measure of safety for the rest of the family) and in that state juvenile judges would not adjudicate. The parents made a final attempt to arrange for some kind of out of home group placement which was denied. They then made an attempt to disrupt the adoption were threatened with child abandonment charges (which would have likely resulted in removal of their infant and would have encumbered both of their medical licenses). Ultimately, they chose the best of a bad set of options and arranged to send their daughter to a therapeutic boarding school. The program costs them around $75K per year and even with both parents being physicians that is a struggle. Fortunately they had their house paid off before this happened so they have minimal housing costs and if both parents work full time and they live pretty frugally they can make it work. I know it is a struggle and I know that they both wish they had more time for each other and for their younger daughter who just turned three but they believe this is the only way they can ensure both of their kids are in a safe place and they are sacrificing a lot for that. If they didn't both have six figure earning ability, or if their younger daughter hadn't been blessed with decent health even in spite of her early and traumatic entry into the world this best of bad sept of options plan would not be financially possible. I can imagine that they are not the only family in this situation.

Thanks for sharing this story. It definitely gives (me, at least) another perspective of what some adoptive parents can face and the difficulties that can follow regarding to judicial and medical lack of support for both the parents and child(ren). I appreciate what these poor parents had to go through - as well as that of the poor kid.

But I still find the majority (or what seems to be the majority) of re-homing not to be based on doing any and everything feasibly possible to help an impossible child, but rather the lack of knowledge and/or unwillingness to at least try every possible thing. Obviously, your friends did do every thing in their power and beyond to get help for their girl and fully agree that what they had to do in the end was not for lack of trying and undoubtedly breaks their hearts every day. They are a prime example of why that type of re-homing isn’t illegal. The difference, though, is that they ended up re-homing her to a therapeutic boarding-school, which nearly equates to a medical-facility. Many others, like this Rep. of Arkansas, seems to have just tired of dealing with whatever problems their daughter(s) were having and there’s nothing about the parents trying to seek outside help from specialists, medical professionals, therapy, etc. IMHO, they probably just relied in their pastor or church for help and advice (who are not qualified in dealing with these things that go way beyond just simple “family dynamics”) and when that didn’t help, they gave up and dumped them off to whomever would take them in - No questions asked, no background checks, nothing. They wanted to put this chapter behind them and pretend like nothing ever happened and move on with “their” lives, without much consideration for how it would affect their adopted girls. Horrible. And this type of re-homing seems to be MUCH more the norm in the US, sadly, rather than the model way your friends did it. There needs to be much better oversight with a lot more compassion and knowledge about disrupting an adopted kids life yet again and again.

Children being adopted aren’t the same as adopting a cute little bunny at the pet-store mill. They are not fodder or commodity either and it shouldn’t be legal to treat them as such whenever it starts to grow tiresome or becomes difficult.
 
OK, I have the presser on...empty podium so far.
 
"The victims here are the children...we are heartbroken by this situation.
We were failed by DHS."

Despite what you may have read we reached out to DHS multiple times and were met with nothing but hostility."
 
"failed by DHS"

reached out to DHS multiple times and were met with nothing but hostility.

like i said earlier it was pretty obvious that it was going to go this way.

will need to wait for the full story to come to any conclusions.
 
He is discussing that he and his wife have degrees in child development. He says he was mislead by DHS that the two younger children had no problems. He claims that the 8 year old stashed sharp rocks and was violent.
 
OK, I have the presser on...empty podium so far.

let us know what is said.

He and his wife should be prosecuted for abandonment. The fact they weren't just smacks of political favoritism.
 
(The theme is that nothing is their fault and poor them)

Ongoing violence by the two girls to their boys. They were not prepared for the girls. Marcia suffered abuse as a child so they pressed on. Their removal of all items from the 6 year old was directed by the pediatrician. The girls murdered and abused pets. All 3 proffessionals

(Cry cry,) he was threatened by DHS by abandonment charges if they returned the girls.
 
Marsha knew Stacy for 20 years. They wanted stacy for the job for the daycare and she recommended her husband instead. Faced with no help of DHS, they thought they had the perfect solution when the Francis' wanted the girls. Short visits to the home, they seemed to be a good fit, had an atty draw up guardianship papers. They forwarded all stipend checks. Harris' handled all doctors visits and provided all clothing etc. DHS told the Harris' in Feb that the Francis' had rehomed the girls.

Harris' gave consent for 3rd family to be adopted.

Because of what we have been through, I support bills to address problems at DHS
 
"We had no turning point so where was I going to go as a legislator if I was threatened with charges"

I am now hip deep in horse puckey.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
74
Guests online
1,678
Total visitors
1,752

Forum statistics

Threads
605,982
Messages
18,196,307
Members
233,685
Latest member
momster0734
Back
Top